Transfer Pricing – Amount B – December 2024 Updates

Transfer Pricing – Amount B – December 2024 Updates

  1. Simplified Streamlined Approach (SSA) by IRS:

    On Dec 18, 2024 US released Treasury Notice (NOTICE 2025-04) intending to issue regs on SSA in alignment with OECD PillarOne – Amount B. The SSA seeks to simplify pricing for baseline marketing & distribution activities by adopting a return on sales percentage from the global pricing matrix & EBIT-to-operating expense ratio cap & collar & country risk adjustment. Key aspects w.r.t. IRS’s notice, apart from Amount B framework, is summarised below:

    1. Taxpayer may rely on SSA for taxable years commencing from January 1, 2025.
    2. SSA similar to Comparable profits method (equivalent of TNMM in OECD guidelines). However, taxpayer can apply CUP (internal or external), where available, instead of SSA.
    3. US proposing applicability of SSA under Option 1 – i.e., at option of taxpayer. But also considering if Option 2 should be permitted viz., may be optional for taxpayer but IRS can decide to apply even if taxpayer has not opted for the same.
    4. Criteria for qualifying transaction – upper bound of Opex-Revenue is 30% for US distributor or if distributor country has not adopted SSA. If non-US distributor & the distributor country has adopted SSA, specified ratio should be x, where 20%≤ x ≤30%.
    5. Taxpayers need to Elect to apply the SSA along with tax return.
    6. Considering incorporating SSA as a Safe Habor – deemed satisfaction of arm’s length st&ard. After taxpayer‘s valid election to SSA no option to disavow later & shall constitute consent to IRS’s use of SSA in calculating any applicable adjustment. Taxpayers must have sufficient documentation proving compliance, which should be available at filing & provided to the IRS within 30 days upon request.
    7. Arm’s Length range & IQR not to apply to SSA.
    8. IRS evaluating an alternative election mechanism for SSA, other than on a transaction-by-transaction & taxable year basis.

    IRS ‘s Notice invites public comments on incorporation of above SSA within Regs 482 on or before March 7, 2025.

  2. OECD –Amount B automated tool:

    On Dec 19, 2024 OECD released Pricing Automation Tool (Excel spreadsheet) to simplify the calculation of returns for in-scope parties with minimal data input. The key aspects are:

    1. Applicable for fiscal years starting on or after January 1, 2025.
    2. Jurisdictions included for illustration & do not reflect any intentions of adoption of Amount B. India not appearing in jurisdiction, perhaps due to reservations.
    3. Input data- jurisdiction, 3 years financial data – net revenues, COGS, operating expenses, fixed assets, working capital, & industry classifications.
    4. Key outputs – Evaluation of quantitative scoping criteria, Accounts payable, final return on sales after considering the pricing matrix, cap-&-collar mechanism & adjustments for operating expenses & data availability.

As businesses expand across borders, navigating complex transfer pricing regulations becomes critical. At VSTN Consultancy, a global transfer pricing firm, we specialize in helping companies stay compliant and competitive across key markets including:

India | UAE | USA | KSA | Dubai | Asia Pacific | Europe | Africa | North America

Whether you’re preparing for benchmarking intercompany transactions, or developing robust TP documentation, our team is here to support your international strategy and Compliance.

Contact us today to explore how we can partner with you to optimize your global transfer pricing approach.

#TransferPricing #TransferPricingFirm#VSTNConsultancy #TaxCompliance #IndiaUAEUSA

#TPExperts#TransferPricingExperts#GlobalTransferPricingFirm

Transfer Pricing – Bahrain – Implementation of Tax on MNEs

Transfer Pricing – Bahrain – Implementation of Tax on MNEs

As a member of the OECD Inclusive Framework and a signatory to the Pillar 2 Solutions, the Kingdom of Bahrain issued Decree Law No.11 – Regarding implementation of tax on multinational enterprises (“The Law”), on September 01, 2024, introducing the Domestic Top Up Tax for Multinational Enterprises (“ MNE’s”). This was followed by an Executive Regulation issued by the Ministry of Finance and National Economy, through Decision No.(172) of 2024 (“Regulation”), which contains the detailed by-laws relating to the Decree Law No.11.

The Law shall come into force from January 01, 2025 and shall be applicable to Constituent Entities of MNE Groups, within the Kingdom of Bahrain provided the MNE Group’s global consolidated annual revenue exceeds EUR 750 million in 2 out of 4 fiscal years immediately preceding the current Fiscal Year. Where the Revenue threshold is met, a minimum effective tax rate of 15% shall be complied with by such Bahraini Constituent Entities.

With this introduction of DMTT, all constituent entities of MNE Group operating in the Kingdom are subject to the transfer pricing provisions and are expected to maintain Local file and Masterfile. The features of the TP regime are on similar lines to the OECD guidelines

Given that the Law comes into force from January 01, 2025, the onus is on the MNEs who have constituent entities within the Kingdom to assess and evaluate the applicability and impact of the said Law to ensure seamless transition to the new regime!

VSTN’s attached Newsletter captures the key parts of DMTT law with emphasis on the TP rules which are to be implemented.

Open Attachment…

Bahrain-Transfer Pricing Insights

Introduction of Pillar 2- Implementation of Tax on MNEs

December 2024

Overview

As a member of the OECD Inclusive Framework since 2018, and a signatory to the Pillar 2 Solutions Statement in 2021, the Kingdom of Bahrain issued Decree Law No.11 – Regarding implementation of tax on multinational enterprises (“The Law”), on September 01, 2024, introducing the Domestic Minimum Top Up Tax for Multinational Enterprises (“MNE’s”). The Law shall come into force from January 01, 2025 to In-Scope Constituent Entities within the Kingdom of Bahrain.

On December 11, 2024, The Ministry of Finance and National Economy, through Decision No.(172) of 2024 issued the executive regulation for the Law (“Regulation”). The Regulation introduces the arm’s length principle in Article 13 thereby bringing In–Scope Constituent Entities, within the ambit of transfer Pricing regulations.

The Law is in line with the OECD Globe Anti- Base Erosion Model Rules (“Globe Rules”).

Scope of Law

Applicability In- Scope Constituent Entities are Constituent Entities of MNE groups whose:-
Effective Tax Rate • Consolidated annual Revenue exceeds EUR 750 million in at least two of the four Fiscal Years immediately preceding that Fiscal Year
• A minimum effective tax rate of 15% shall be met by Bahraini Constituent Entities.
• If the effective rate of the Constituent Entity is lower, then additional Tax may be imposed to ensure that the effective tax rate of 15% is met
Excluded Entities • Government bodies;
• International organizations;
• Non-profit organizations;
• Pension funds;
• Investment fund that is an ultimate parent entity (“UPE”);
• Real estate investment vehicle that is a UPE;
• Entity, other than a pension service entity, subject to meeting certain conditions.

Note: – For the purposes of determining whether the revenue threshold EUR 750 million is met, the revenues of excluded entities are also to be considered.

Entity Location

  • In case of a constituent entity is located in more than one jurisdiction then the jurisdictional location of the constituent entity shall be determined as follows:
    • Where a tax treaty is in force between the jurisdictions, Constituent Entity shall be deemed to be in the jurisdiction where it is resident for the purposes of that Tax Treaty
    • However where there is no tax treaty in force or where the competent authorities have not reached a consensus as to the tax residency of the Constituent entity then the jurisdictional location of the constituent entity shall be determined as follows:
      • The Constituent Entity shall be deemed as located in the jurisdiction where it paid more Covered Taxes for the Fiscal Year, without considering the taxes paid under Controlled Foreign Company Tax Regime
      • If the amount of Covered Taxes paid in both jurisdictions is the same or zero, the Constituent Entity shall be deemed as located in the jurisdiction where it has more Substance-based Income Exclusion computed on a standalone basis for the Fiscal Year.
      • If the amount of Substance-based Income Exclusion in both jurisdictions is the same or zero for the Fiscal Year, the Constituent Entity shall be considered a Stateless Constituent Entity unless the Constituent Entity is the Ultimate Parent Entity (UPE) of the MNE Group, in which case it shall be deemed as being located in the jurisdiction where it is created.

Pillar 2- DMTT

Effective Tax Rate (“ETR”)

  • The ETR shall be computed for all Constituent Entities located in the Kingdom which are members of the same MNE Group.
  • ETR is computed as follows:
ETR Adjusted Covered taxes Net Constituent Entity Income

Where,

Adjusted Covered Taxes means current tax expense for that Fiscal Year of all Constituent Entities in the Kingdom, as accrued in its Financial Accounting Net Income or Loss considered as Covered Taxes as set out in the Regulations

Net Constituent Entity Income means the positive sum of the aggregate Income and the aggregate Loss, of all the Constituent Entities located in the Kingdom.

  • Additional Tax: Where the ETR computed above falls below the minimum tax rate (i.e. 15%), the difference between the ETR and minimum rate shall regarded as additional tax rate that shall be applied on the taxable income to arrive at the additional tax amount.

Taxable Income for the above purposes shall mean

Taxable Income Net Constituent Entity Income Substance Based Income Exclusion
  • The substance based income exclusion shall be the sum of:
    • Certain payroll costs incurred by Constituent Entity in the Kingdom (Starting from 9.6% in FY 2025 and gradually decreasing to 5% in FY 2033); and
    • Carrying value of certain tangible assets of Constituent Entities located in the Kingdom at the end of the Fiscal Year (Starting from 7.6% in FY 2025 and gradually decreasing to 5% in FY 2033)

Computation of Tax Due

  • The Tax due shall be the sum of:
    • Additional Tax: As explained above (Differential tax between 15% minimum rate and the ETR for all Bahrain CEs of the MNE Group.
    • Additional Current Tax: This refers to any amount of Tax for a Fiscal Year resulting from an adjustment in Covered Taxes or the Constituent Entity Income or Loss as a result of the recomputation of the Effective Tax Rate for a prior Fiscal Year.
    • Additional Tax for Permanent Differences: This is calculated as the absolute value of the aggregate Adjusted Covered Taxes minus the absolute value of the Net CE Income multiplied by minimum rate i.e. 15%. This tax shall be applicable if certain conditions are met.

De Minimus Exclusion

  • Where the following two conditions are met, the tax for a filing constituent entity for a fiscal year shall be zero:
    • The Average Constituent Entity Revenue of all Constituent Entities located in the Kingdom, which are members of the same Multinational Enterprise Group, is less than ten million Euro (EUR 10 million).
    • The Average Constituent Entity Income or Loss of all Constituent Entities located in the Kingdom, which are members of the same Multinational Enterprise Group, is a loss or income less than one million Euro (EUR 1 million).

Transitional Country-by-Country Reporting (CbC) Safe Harbor

  • For fiscal years beginning on or before 31 December 2026, but excluding fiscal years ending after 30 June 2028, the tax due may be considered “nil” if any of the following conditions are met:
    • If the De minimus criteria as above is satisfied,
    • An alternative ETR for the MNE Group in Bahrain is equal to, or greater than 16% and 17% for fiscal years beginning in 2025 and 2026, respectively.
    • Total CbC profit /(loss) of the MNE Group in Bahrain is equal to, or less than the substance-based income exclusion amount determined under the Law (as explained above).
  • The above transitional provisions shall not apply to:
    • a Stateless CE,
    • a multi-parented MNE Group which does not report the information of the combined subgroups in a single CbC reporting (with the exception of their JVs), or
    • Constituent Entity that has entered into a hybrid arbitrage arrangement after 15 December 2022.

Arm’s Length Principle

Introduction

  • In- Scope Constituent Entity located in the Kingdom i.e Constituent Entities which are part of the MNE Group meeting the revenue threshold of EUR 750 million in 2 out 4 fiscal years preceding the current fiscal year, shall make necessary adjustments in determining its Constituent Entity Income or Loss to ensure that an outcome of a transaction or an arrangement with another Constituent Entity located in a different jurisdiction, which is a member of the same Multinational Enterprise Group, is consistent with the Arm’s Length Principle.
  • Arm’s Length Principle refers to principle wherein the transactions between Constituent Entities shall be recorded as it would have been done between independent enterprises in comparable transactions and under comparable circumstances.
  • The Arm’s Length Principle has been introduced under Article 12 of the Law, which provides that the Constituent Entity Income or Loss for a fiscal year shall be the Financial Accounting Net Income or Loss of that Fiscal Year after various adjustments as provided under said Article, including adjustments in respect of cross border transactions of the Constituent Entity to ensure arm’s length.
  • It is to be noted that the Regulation, in Article 13, specifically mentions about adjusting the outcome of transactions undertaken by the Constituent Entity with another Constituent Entity of the same MNE Group, located in a different jurisdiction to arrive at the Constituent Entity Income or Loss.
  • Accordingly it can be inferred that it covers only cross border transactions between Constituent Entities of the same MNE Group, with an exception being transactions relating to loss on sale or transfer of asset between Constituent Entities of the same MNE Group within the Kingdom, which shall be adjusted by applying the arm’s length principle to arrive at the Constituent Entities Income or Loss.
  • However MNE’s may need to evaluate this factor considering that Clause E of Article 13, mandates all transactions between in- scope Constituent Entities even within the Kingdom to comply with local file and master file requirements.

Transfer Pricing Methods

  • For the purposes of applying the arm’s length principle, the Law provides for the use of the most appropriate method considering the facts and circumstances of the transaction. No priority of methods have been prescribed.
  • For determination of the arm’s length result of a transaction or arrangement between Related Parties the Law prescribes the application of one of the following methods which are in line with the OECD TP Guidelines:
    • Traditional Transactional Methods
      • Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method
      • Resale Price Method
      • Cost-Plus Method
    • Transactional Profit Methods
      • Transactional Profit Split Method
      • Transactional Net Margin Method
  • It is to be noted that the Law does not recognise the use of ‘Other method’ as provided by the OECD guidelines. The Other Method is generally used where the business can demonstrate that the specified methods cannot be reasonably applied to determine an arm’s length result.
  • Further the Law does not specifically allow the use of multiple / combination of methods for determining the arm’s length result.

Documentation Requirements

  • With the introduction of local file and Masterfile, Bahrain is aligning itself with the 3 tier documentation approach of the OECD as Country by Country reporting (CbC) regulations are already implemented in Bahrain.
  • In scope- Constituent entities within the kingdom are mandatorily required to maintain master file and local file. Documents under these Regulations shall be kept and maintained for a period of five years following the end of the Fiscal Year to which they relate.
Master File Contents Local File Contents
Master file should provide an overview of the MNE Group business, including nature of its global business operations, its overall transfer pricing policies etc The Local file provides more detailed information relating to transactions between Constituent Entities pertaining to a particular jurisdiction.
The information to be documented in the Master file can categorized into the following groups:

  1. Organisation Structure
  2. Description of MNE group’s business(es)
  3. MNE group’s intangibles
  4. MNE group’s intercompany financial activities
  5. MNE group’s financial and tax positions including APA and other tax rulings relating to allocation of income among countries
 The important information to be included in the Local file are:

  1. Details of Transactions between Constituent Entities
  2. Group Overview
  3. Industry Overview
  4. Functional, Assets and Risk Analysis including significant changes if any, compared to prior years
  5. Comparability Analysis including details of comparability adjustments made to the results of Tested party or comparbles or both, and details of significant changes if any compared to prior years

Advance Pricing Agreement (APA)

  • There is a reference to APAs in Article 13 which states that where a bilateral or multilateral Advance Pricing Agreement has been agreed by the relevant competent authorities of the jurisdictions of the Constituent Entities, the adjustment to the Constituent Entity Income or Loss shall be applied consistently in accordance with the arm’s length price agreed under the Advance Pricing Agreement. Hence it appears that Bahrain is bringing in the APA regime as well for tax certainty.

Administrative Procedures

  • Registration:
    • Filing Constituent Entity shall apply for registration within 120 days from the first day of the transition year, or
    • Within 30 days following the date on which the Law comes into force i.e. January 31, 2025 if the Revenue threshold is met for two out of the past four fiscal years.
    • The Filing Constituent Entity will be required to submit registration application which shall contain details on the MNE group, ownership structure, fiscal year of UPE, Constituent entities, JV’s and JV subsidiaries of the MNE Group, Financial Information and written consent from relevant entities. The Bureau will issue a registration certificate on acceptance.
  • Deregistration: An application for deregistration must be made within 30 days when any of the following cases:
    • Revenue Threshold is not met for 5 consecutive years
    • MNE Group does not have any Constituent Entities, Joint Ventures, Joint Venture Subsidiaries due to liquidation, dissolution etc.,
    • The Group is no longer an MNE Group
    • Any other circumstances
  • If the filing constituent entity does not file for deregistration, then the Bureau can deregister the entity.
  • Appointment of Filing Constituent Entity
    • The Filing Constituent Entity must file a written consent from all Constituent Entities in the Kingdom to the Bureau.
    • Where the Filing Constituent Entity ceases operations or leaves the MNE Group, a new Filing Constituent Entity must be appointed within 30 days from the date of the occurrence of such event.
  • Tax return:
    • The Filing Constituent Entity must submit a tax return within 15 months of the last day of the Reporting Fiscal Year,
  • Payment of Tax
    • A Filing Constituent Entity shall pay advance payments of Tax for each full three-month period during a Fiscal Year
    • Where the length of the Fiscal Year is shorter than three months, then no advance tax payments arises
    • The balance of tax due must be paid within 15 months of the end of the fiscal year.

Conclusion

The DMTT Law and the Transfer Pricing provisions are more or less aligned to the Globe Rules and the OECD Guidelines.

With the applicability of DMTT Law commencing from 01, January 2025, the MNEs having Constituent Entities in the Kingdom will need to assess the applicability of the said provision and evaluate its impact so as to ensure smooth transition, within a short time.

Transfer Pricing Compliances

  • Determining applicability of the Law to Constituent Entities within Bahrain.
  • Analysis of transactions that would be covered under the Bahrain TP regime
  • Undertake TP benchmarking analysis for the covered transactions to be in line with the arm’s length principle.
  • Assist with regular TP compliances Master file, Local file, CbC report

Transfer Pricing Advisory

  • Price Setting: Advice on suitable pricing model and transfer pricing policy
  • Assistance in implementation of TP policy and periodic review of margins earned
  • Review/Drafting of intercompany agreements for the covered transactions
  • Supply chain Re-Structuring
  • Possible Advance Pricing Agreement assistance, once rules are notified
  • Advice on Intra-Group Services, Management Charges, royalty, Cost Contribution Arrangements and financing transactions
  • Support on estimating the profit attribution to Permanent Establishments
  • Impact Analysis for Pillar 2

As businesses expand across borders, navigating complex transfer pricing regulations becomes critical. At VSTN Consultancy, a global transfer pricing firm, we specialize in helping companies stay compliant and competitive across key markets including:

India | UAE | USA | KSA | Dubai | Asia Pacific | Europe | Africa | North America

Whether you’re preparing for benchmarking intercompany transactions, or developing robust TP documentation, our team is here to support your international strategy and Compliance.

Contact us today to explore how we can partner with you to optimize your global transfer pricing approach.

#TransferPricing #TransferPricingFirm#VSTNConsultancy #TaxCompliance #IndiaUAEUSA

#TPExperts#TransferPricingExperts#GlobalTransferPricingFirm

Year End Transfer Pricing Adjustments

Transfer Pricing – Navigating Year End Transfer Pricing Adjustments

With the fiscal year coming to a close for MNEs operating on a calendar year basis, it is essential to evaluate whether transfer prices need to be revisited before yearend closure. In the UAE, CT law has kicked in for years commencing after 1 June 2023 & this would be the first year of TP compliance for many UAE businesses with calendar year. All related party transaction should meet the arm’s length standard irrespective of any thresholds, making it vital to streamline TP policies & make necessary year end adjustments.

Companies carry out year end adjustments (True-up/True down adjustment) if faced with one of the below scenarios

  • Actual results/margins deviate from targeted margin as per intercompany agreement/pricing policy
    Eg:where fixed return model is followed by a limited risk bearing entity (contract manufacturer/LRD/contract service provider) deviations can be due to differences between budgeted & actual costs & billings based on budgets; or variance in components of costs considered for billing & for TP purposes (operating costs).
  • The actual margin earned is not at arm’s length when compared to comparable companies for that particular period, based on the comparability analysis carried out to arrive at the arm’s length range.

These adjustments are necessary to achieve arm’s length results in compliance with local regulation & reduce exposure of audit adjustments. Any adjustment done post book closure can only be considered in the tax return (ie suo moto adjustment) & may give rise to other implications (additional interest, secondary adjustment if applicable in that country).

While performing yearend adjustments one needs to consider:

  1. Whether intercompany agreements contain applicable clauses relating to true-up/true-down adjustments
  2. When adjustments are required as per scenario b) above, to what point of arm’s length range should the adjustment be made by UAE taxpayers– 25th/75th percentile or median of the dataset?
  3. In a one sided-testing approach, whether the adjustments made would be acceptable & justifiable from the viewpoint of the counter party’s jurisdiction
  4. Implications on duties paid (Customs) for imports when there is downward price adjustment-whether the same would be treated as sunk cost or refund can be claimed
  5. Revenue figures reported in periodic other statutory filings (indirect tax filing) during the year-whether the same should be revised
  6. Interplay with Pillar2

While year end adjustments may be inevitable in some cases, it is desirable that the adjustment quantum is minimal. This is possible through periodic (monthly, quarterly) monitoring & evaluation of profitability levels through the year. This is where operationaltransferpricing gains importance & technology tools can be leveraged for effective implementation of TP polices.

As businesses expand across borders, navigating complex transfer pricing regulations becomes critical. At VSTN Consultancy, a global transfer pricing firm, we specialize in helping companies stay compliant and competitive across key markets including:

India | UAE | USA | KSA | Dubai | Asia Pacific | Europe | Africa | North America

Whether you’re preparing for benchmarking intercompany transactions, or developing robust TP documentation, our team is here to support your international strategy and Compliance.

Contact us today to explore how we can partner with you to optimize your global transfer pricing approach.

#TransferPricing #TransferPricingFirm#VSTNConsultancy #TaxCompliance #IndiaUAEUSA

#TPExperts#TransferPricingExperts#GlobalTransferPricingFirm

Transfer Pricing – Safe Harbour Rules (SHR)

Transfer Pricing – Safe Harbour Rules (SHR) – Sale Of Raw Diamonds By Foreign Company

The CBDT on 29 Nov 2024 issued a notification to extend the existing SHR for AY 2024-25. The notification also introduced new SHR for sale of raw diamonds by Foreign company chargeable under Profits & gains of business or profession(‘PGBP’).

Due date u/s 139(1) for AY 2024-25 has been extended to 15 Dec 2024. Eligible Taxpayers may consider opting under safe harbor for their eligible international transactions for FY 23-24, as the due date for filing the application for Safe Habor is now extended to 15 Dec 2024.

The New SHR is introduced for the first time for Section 9(1)(i) – within the power u/s 92CB, unlike earlier Safe harbor which was for determination of ALP u/s 92C / 92CA. Introduction of the new SHR was mentioned in the budget speech by the Finance Minister for FY 2024-25, which was a long pending demand from the industry. The industry expressed that foreign mining companies were deterred from sale of raw diamonds in India due to issues surrounding Permanent establishment ( PE ). The new SHR is akin to presumptive basis of taxation in PGBP. Key points of the new SHR is provided below:

Eligible Assessee – Foreign company in the business of diamond mining

Eligible Business – Sale of raw diamonds in any notified specified zone as per Section 9(1)(i) Expl.1 (e)

Safe Harbor – 4% of the gross receipts to be charged as profits & gains under head of PGBP. Deductions u/s 30 to 38 shall be deemed to be provided. No set-off of unabsorbed depreciation or business loss shall be allowed.

Other Aspects – To opt under new SHR, application to be filed by taxpayer in Form No. 3CEFC. Rule 10TIB provides detailed process / procedures for Assessing officer to determine whether taxpayer has correctly opted under the new SHR. Taxpayer cannot invoke Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) where new SHR is opted. Sections 92D and 92E would be applicable if the eligible assessee enters into international transaction.

With regard to above, one has to consider the following:

  1. New SHR is for income chargeable to tax under head of PGBP and there is no reference to deemed acceptance from an arm’s length price perspective in case of international transactions
  2. Power to make Safe harbor by CBDT u/s 92CB is for determination of ALP u/s 92C / 92CA or section 9 (1) (i). The new SHR is with regard to the latter, and hence the general transfer pricing regulations would continue to apply.
  3. As it relates to computation under PGBP, AO undertakes the verification of the Form and there is no reference to transfer pricing officer (TPO) unlike the existing SHR for the international transactions.

Therefore, one will have to evaluate the interplay between the new SHR for Diamond mining – foreign companies and transfer pricing regulations

As businesses expand across borders, navigating complex transfer pricing regulations becomes critical. At VSTN Consultancy, a global transfer pricing firm, we specialize in helping companies stay compliant and competitive across key markets including:

India | UAE | USA | KSA | Dubai | Asia Pacific | Europe | Africa | North America

Whether you’re preparing for benchmarking intercompany transactions, or developing robust TP documentation, our team is here to support your international strategy and Compliance.

Contact us today to explore how we can partner with you to optimize your global transfer pricing approach.

#TransferPricing #TransferPricingFirm#VSTNConsultancy #TaxCompliance #IndiaUAEUSA

#TPExperts#TransferPricingExperts#GlobalTransferPricingFirm

Consult Visionary Solutions Transferpricing Network(VSTN) for your needs.

Contact Us