VSTN
+91 99620 12244 contact@vstnconsultancy.com
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Why Choose Us
    • Our Team
  • Our Services
    • Transfer Pricing Advisory
    • Benchmarking
    • Due Diligence
    • BEPS Related Services
    • Safe Harbour
    • TP- Documentation
    • Litigation
    • Advance Pricing Agreements
    • Other Services
  • Company Profile
  • Insights
  • Contact Us
  • Recognition
VSTN
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Why Choose Us
    • Our Team
  • Our Services
    • Transfer Pricing Advisory
    • Benchmarking
    • Due Diligence
    • BEPS Related Services
    • Safe Harbour
    • TP- Documentation
    • Litigation
    • Advance Pricing Agreements
    • Other Services
  • Company Profile
  • Insights
  • Contact Us
  • Recognition

Capacity Adjustment

Capacity Adjustment

In Transfer Pricing documentation, businesses undertake economic adjustments in case of differences in economic circumstances between controlled and uncontrolled transactions. Manufacturing companies, in their initial phase, effect capacity utilization adjustment where there is material underutilisation of capacity, resulting in under-absorption of fixed overheads and thereby negatively impacting profitability. Some of the approaches to undertake capacity utilization adjustment include:

  1. Comparables Capacity %: Comparison of company’s capacity utilization with comparable companies, and adjustment of fixed costs based on the differential underutilized capacity. However, from FY 2011-12 (with updates in Revised Schedule VI), disclosure of installed and actual utilization capacity is non-mandatory in the financial statements and hence is challenging to obtain comparable data points.
  2. Fixed cost / Sales: Tax payers use Fixed cost / sales to demonstrate underutilization of the capacity & effect economic adjustment based on the differential vis-à-vis comparable companies.
  3. RBI reports: Since 2008, the RBI has been conducting the Order Books, Inventories, and Capacity Utilization Survey (OBICUS) on a quarterly basis, focusing on the manufacturing sector. Certain Tribunals have ruled in favour of the taxpayer, where RBI reports were relied by taxpayer to arrive at average industry utilization and thereby computing capacity adjustment.
  4. Depreciation to average WDV of Assets: Ratio of depreciation expense to the average WDV of assets as proxy of capacity utilization. Taxpayers adopt this adjustment where WDV method is adopted by the taxpayer, resulting in significant depreciation expense in the initial years vis-à-vis the comparable companies (where SLM method is adopted), and has found favour with some Tribunals.
  5. Break-even Point (BEP) Analysis: CVP analysis, based on margin of safety and BEP can be used to highlight underutilization. With data availability, regression analysis can be used to quantify the adjustment – a robust statistical approach.

Some  key considerations include:

  1. Robust documentation of business rationale for such adjustment to be included in the TP documentation such as initial phase of setting-up of the taxpayers’ operations, significant shut downs due to uncontrolled economic / technology factors, etc as well as mapping with the characterisation.
  2. Selection of appropriate approach to effect capacity adjustment based on factors like industry characteristics, business facts & circumstances as well as accuracy of capacity utilisation information. Taxpayers must also bear in mind that approaches adopted for computing capacity adjustments should be robust so that it is palatable at higher appellate levels

CASC Article- APA Considerations

CASC Article on “Strategic Deliberation of APA Feasibility: Specific Business Scenarios”

VSTN has recently published an article “Strategic Deliberation of APA Feasibility: Specific Business Scenarios” co authored by Nithya Srinivasan and E Rajesh in the CASC Monthly Bulletin of January 2025.

The article mainly dwells on key considerations that taxpayers and businesses will have to bear in mind before filing APA application with respect certain transaction groups and business scenarios. The article also covers key costs heads w.r.t. Advance Pricing Agreement, from the filing of APA application and on post APA compliances.

This article aims to provide inputs that would facilitate taxpayers and businesses to make a more informed decision before filing of APA or during feasibility analysis before deciding APA as the most appropriate Dispute resolution mechanism.

Considering that in the recent APA report issued by CBDT for FY 2023-24 there has been a record number of APAs concluded- total of 125 (86 UAPA, 39 BAPA) and BAPAs filed – 78 and the pending inventory as % of the total applications dipped to 46% as at FY 23-24 from 50% as at FY 22-23 signalling a good momentum.

VSTN Article’s also emphasises that it is best taxpayers approach the APA program for the appropriate cases, to ensure that APA forum is not clogged with cases which would have obtained dispute resolution through another forum, efficiently.

Know More…

Recent Posts
  • TP – Arm’s Length Analysis
  • Transfer Pricing Compliance Timelines
  • UAE – Interest Deduction
  • ITR World Tax – Mining Sector
  • CBDT Update FY 2024-25
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    Categories
    • Transfer Pricing
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Consult Visionary Solutions Transferpricing Network(VSTN) for your needs.

    Contact Us

    Transfer Pricing Experts

    +91 99620 12244
    contact@vstnconsultancy.com

    VSTN Consultancy Pvt Ltd., © 2025. All Rights Reserved.