Global Transfer Pricing Firm–TP Expert India,UAE
+91 99620 12244
+971 58 305 3317
contact@vstnconsultancy.com
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Why Choose Us
    • Industries We Serve
    • Who We Are
    • Our Team
  • Our Services
    • Transfer Pricing Advisory
    • Benchmarking
    • Key Managerial Personnel – KMP
    • Due Diligence
    • BEPS Related Services
    • Safe Harbour
    • TP Documentation
    • Litigation
    • Advance Pricing Agreement
    • Other Services
  • Company Profile
  • INSIGHTS
    • Articles
    • ACCA Approved Employer
    • News
    • Photo Gallery
    • Events
    • Sitemap
  • Recognition
  • Careers
  • Contact US
Global Transfer Pricing Firm–TP Expert India,UAE
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Why Choose Us
    • Industries We Serve
    • Who We Are
    • Our Team
  • Our Services
    • Transfer Pricing Advisory
    • Benchmarking
    • Key Managerial Personnel – KMP
    • Due Diligence
    • BEPS Related Services
    • Safe Harbour
    • TP Documentation
    • Litigation
    • Advance Pricing Agreement
    • Other Services
  • Company Profile
  • INSIGHTS
    • Articles
    • ACCA Approved Employer
    • News
    • Photo Gallery
    • Events
    • Sitemap
  • Recognition
  • Careers
  • Contact US

APA Annual Report

India APA Annual Report FY 2024-25 and OECD APA & MAP Statistics 2024

The CBDT in October 2025, released its 7th Advance Pricing agreement (APA) annual report for the period FY 2024-25. APA is one of the foremost tools relied by taxpayers and tax authorities alike in dispute resolution for transfer pricing cases.

On OECD Tax Certainty Day 2025 – 31 October 2025, the OECD released the statistics for APA and MAP cases across the globe – 144 jurisdictions (MAP) and 49 jurisdictions (BAPA). OECD also announced awards under various categories such as Cooperation, Most improved jurisdiction, Caseload management, age of inventory, average time to conclude MAP cases and for BAPA as well. India was awarded under two categories –“Cooperation” category under MAP: India and Japan and “Most improved Jurisdiction – BAPA”.

The key aspects and insights of this 7th APA annual report issued by the CBDT is captured in the below alert. This alert also incorporates insights from the OECD’s 2024 APA and MAP statistics, capturing global trends and India’s comparative performance.

Global dispute resolution landscape, especially in transfer pricing, is evolving in past few years. Taxpayers will have to be mindful of these global developments while formulating their strategy on dispute resolution and dispute prevention w.r.t. transfer pricing.

India ’s APA programme is maturing over the decade with increase in the pace of conclusions – both UAPA and BAPA as well as increase adoption of BAPA through change in UAPA:BAPA ratio.

In case of any support please feel free to reach us at snithya@vstnconsultancy.com

Open Attachment…

VSTN APA Alert Nov 2025

India APA Annual report

FY 2024-25 and OECD APA & MAP Statistics 2024


Summary

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in October 2025 has issued the seventh Annual Report on the Advance Pricing Agreement (“APA”) Programme for FY 2024-25. The APA Report captures data and statistics of the APA programme ending FY 2024-25.

The APA annual report includes data on APA applications filed, status of APAs, concluded APAs, nature of transactions covered in APA and location of associated enterprises (AE). APAs plays a vital role in ease of doing business in India, through providing tax certainty for transfer pricing. As at FY 2024-25, APA is said to have brought certainty for income around INR 35,000 crores, cumulatively bringing certainty over 4,400 Assessment years. Further, in FY 2024-25, India concluded 174 APAs (Unilateral and Bilateral), the highest number of APAs concluded in the history of the programme. It also signed the maximum number of Bilateral APAs (BAPAs) and its first Multilateral APA (MAPA). The data is presented across Unilateral APA (UAPA) and Bilateral APA (BAPA). The Annual report also touches upon the key statistics on Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP). The closing inventory of MAP cases for CY 2024 stood at 386 cases and continued the trend of decrease in the closing inventory from 2020.

On the OECD Tax certainty day 2025 – 31 October 2025, OECD announced the awards for APA and MAP for various categories. India was awarded in two categories – “APA Most Improved Jurisdiction” category, third highest after Ireland and Mexico, as well as in the “Cooperation” category – India and Japan were awarded for the most number of transfer pricing cases fully resolved under MAP. The report also captures the OECD’s 2024 APA and MAP statistics, highlighting data on caseloads, applications filed and concluded, closing ratios, APA-to-MAP ratios, as well as key trends and recognition of jurisdictions through various APA and MAP awards.

The key aspects of the APA annual report for FY 2024-25 issued by the CBDT, as well OECD MAP and APA statistics for 2024 is captured in the below sections.

Best Newcomer APAC

Best Newcomer in the Middle East

Middle East Transfer Pricing Practice Leader

I Recommended Firm | Highly Regarded |

I Notable Practitioner | Trusted Talent |

I Women in Tax Leader | Recognised Firm |

India APA Annual report: FY 24-25

APA – Applications

The APA programme has been maturing over the years, witnessed through the change in the UAPA: BAPA ratio. The number of BAPA applications was the highest in FY 2024-25 and the annual report states that the trend towards BAPA indicates confidence in quick and efficient resolutions with other treaty partners.

Below chart summarizes the applications over the first decade of the APA programme.

APA Applications

The number of BAPA applications has reached the highest since the commencement of the APA programme. This, along with reducing UAPA:BAPA ratio implies a shift in taxpayer’s mindset towards adopting wholistic dispute resolution by way of BAPA.

APA Conclusions

There has been an increase at the pace at which APAs are being concluded. This can be seen through reduction in the APA average inventory over the last annual reports (viz., FY 2018-19, FY 2021-22, FY 2022-23, FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25). The summary data provided in the Annual report as well as the computed Average inventory and Average APA signed per year1 is captured in the table below:

1 Data points from APA Annual Report is provided in black and the computed ratios / indicators is provided in orange.

Particulars Applications (A) Concluded (B) Disposed (C)2 Pending (D = A-B-C) Avg Inv % (E=D/A) % No of Years (F) Avg APA Signed (G=B/F)
FY 2012-13 to FY 2018-19 1155 271 82 802 69% 7 39
FY 2012-13 to FY 2021-22 1499 421 194 884 59% 10 42
FY 2012-13 to FY 2022-23 1659 516 315 828 50% 11 47
FY 2012-13 to FY 2023-24 1847 641 348 858 46% 12 58
FY 2012-13 to FY 2024-25 2062 815 389 858 42% 13 63

The year-wise pending inventory of APA applications as per FY 2024-25 annual report is captured in the below table. This reflects the tax authority’s focus on completion of earlier APA applications.

FY 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Pending Inventory (%) 2% 6% 10% 9% 28% 38% 36% 46% 42% 61% 79% 74% 95%

The number of APAs signed in each financial year is plotted in the chart below. There was a reduction in number of APAs concluded in FY 2020-21 due to the COVID pandemic, but there has been a strong rebound in number of APAs concluded from FY 2021-22 – with a record conclusion in FY 2024-25. During the pandemic period, adaptive measures such as virtual discussions and remote signing protocols are said to have aided in sign-off / conclusion of APAs.

APA Signed

APA Applications disposed due to reasons other than conclusion / sign-off

Unilateral APA (UAPA)

UAPA has witnessed an increase in the pace of sign-off. The average inventory has reduced from 39% as at FY 2023-24 to 35% as at FY 2024-25. Similarly, the average number of APAs concluded per year has increased from 42 as at FY 2023-24 to 47 as at FY 2024-25, implying organic reduction in inventory. Analysis of the mean, median and mode of time taken to conclude UAPA provides insights on closure of UAPA applications. The decrease in the time period for conclusion of UAPA – mean and median of the conclusions indicating the positive momentum of the APA program.

Time period Mean Median Mode
FY 2023-24 43 months (37-48 Months) 41 months (37-48 Months) 25-36 Months
FY 2024-25 42 months (37-48 Months) 40 months (37-48 Months) 25-36 Months

Services have been the major sector in which were signed during FY 2024-25 approx. 56%, followed by manufacturing, trading & service. Major industries for which APA were concluded include IT and Industrial/Commercial goods.

The below table illustrates the top transactions covered in descending order:

FY 2024-25 – List of major transactions

  • Provision of ITeS
  • Provision of back office ITeS
  • Receipt of management/ corporate support services
  • Provision of SWD services
  • Other expenses
  • Export of finished goods

Major jurisdictions in which AEs were located for the covered transactions were United States, United Kingdom and Singapore in FY 2024-25. The transfer pricing methods used were majorly Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) and Other Method for FY 2024-25.

Bilateral APA (BAPA)

The APA programme has been maturing towards complete dispute resolution, which is witnessed through consistent BAPA applications recording highest number of BAPA applications and conclusions since inception of APA. Average BAPA inventory reduced from 65% as at FY 2023-24 to 57% as at FY 2024-25. This reduction was also organic – increase in average BAPA signed per year from 11 (FY 2024-25) to 15 (FY 2024-25) per annum. The mean and median time for conclusion of BAPA has reduced, indicating an increase in the pace of the conclusion of BAPA per se. The increase in the mode is indicative of the focus by the CBDT to reduce the pending / backlog of BAPA applications.

Time period Mean Median Mode
FY 2023-24 58 months (49-60 months) 58 months (49-60 months) 52 months (49-60 months)
FY 2024-25 55 months (49-60 months) 56 months (49-60 months) 54 months (49-60 months)

Service was the major sector in which BAPA was concluded during FY 2024-25 approx. 94%, followed by manufacturing. Major industries for which APA were concluded include IT/ITeS and services.

FY 2024-25, major transactions were reimbursement/recovery of expenses, provision of IT/ITeS, provision of SWD services, trade receivable/payable/advance and purchase/sale of finished goods.

United States, Singapore, United Kingdom, Japan and Australia were the major jurisdictions with which BAPA applications (amounting to 73% of the total application filed) were filed and BAPA were concluded during FY 2024-25. The transfer pricing method used most to conclude BAPA was TNMM followed by Other Method during FY 2024-25.

FY 2024-25 saw the first MAPA being concluded with India as a treaty partner, which is a major milestone in the Indian APA program.

Mutual Agreement Procedure

India continues to demonstrate progress in resolving cross-border tax disputes through the MAP mechanism under its DTAAs. For the calendar year 2024, India recorded 96 new MAP cases and resolved 131 cases, resulting in a decline in the closing inventory from 421 to 386 cases. This consistent reduction in pendency reflects India’s strengthened engagement with treaty partners, improved coordination between Competent Authorities, and the increasing maturity of bilateral relationships. The trend since 2020 shows a steady improvement in efficiency and resolution timelines under the MAP framework.

OECD APA and MAP – 2024 Statistics

APA

According to the OECD’s 2024 APA Statistics Report, global engagement with APAs continues to strengthen, reflecting tax administrations’ and MNEs’ growing preference for advance certainty mechanisms in transfer pricing. The global APA caseload rose in 2024, from 3,972 cases as opening inventory to 4,089 cases as closing inventory – 1,141 new applications filed and 826 APAs concluded, signifying sustained growth driven by rising cross-border complexities and proactive dispute prevention efforts.

Globally, Norway recorded the highest APA closing ratio of 87.5%, followed by Malta 54.5% and Denmark 38.7%. The average closing ratio across all jurisdictions stood at 18.1%, reflecting gradual progress in addressing backlogs.

The APA to MAP ratio globally was 37.8%, with India featuring in the top 15 jurisdictions at 50.2%.

VStn Consultancy

Notably, 80 jurisdictions reported allowing bilateral APAs (up from 73 in 2023), with 49 jurisdictions actively managing cases. The number of bilateral APA filings rose by 3%, and about one quarter of the APA inventory was closed, consistent with the previous year. The average time to conclude APAs increased to 39.6 months, compared to 36.8 months in 2023.

Several jurisdictions indicated that APAs account for more than half of their bilateral transfer pricing caseload, with 11 jurisdictions reporting APA-to-MAP ratios above 50%, while the overall global ratio averaged 37.8%. Although the number of APAs granted declined by 2%, the share of APAs rejected or closed without agreement increased from 12% in 2023 to over 19% in 2024.

APA Awards

  • APA Most Improved Jurisdiction: Winner – Ireland with 900 %(+9 cases), followed by Mexico with 333%(+10 cases) and India with 103%(+33 cases) increase in APAs granted from 2023.
  • APA Caseload Management: Winner – Denmark (~39 % closing ratio).

MAP

The OECD’s MAP statistics indicated a marginal increase in the global average time for resolution of MAP cases – from 32 months in 2023 to 30.9 months in 2024 for transfer pricing cases. Further there was an increase in the full resolution of MAP cases – from 74% in 2023 to 76% in 2024, demonstrating the dedication of the Competent Authorities across the globe.

In 2024, only 4% of MAP cases were closed without agreement, underscoring the continued efforts of competent authorities to reach mutual resolutions. The MAP inventory profile showed improvement, with just 3.3% of cases pre-dating 2016, less than 20% older than four years, and over 56% under two years old, indicating progress in clearing long-pending cases. However, total MAP inventories recorded a slight increase, with transfer pricing cases up by 3.9% and other cases by 2.7%, reflecting a return to pre-pandemic trends.

The year also saw an increase in new MAP cases, particularly transfer pricing cases (+29.1%) and other cases (+8.1%), while closed MAP cases declined by 2.8% following a record-high number of closures in 2023, mainly due to a 5.5% drop in closed transfer pricing cases.

Jurisdictions continue to place strong emphasis on dispute prevention, with a growing number of bilateral and multilateral APA filings, aligning with the ongoing focus of the OECD’s Forum on Tax Administration MAP Forum on strengthening preventive mechanisms and promoting the best practices outlined in the Bilateral APA Manual.

MAP Awards

  • Average time to close MAP cases
    • (Transfer pricing cases): Winner – Switzerland (~20 months)
    • (Other cases): Winner – New Zealand (~3.55 months)
  • Age of inventory: Winner – Mexico (no pre-2016 cases)

Vstn Consultancy

  • Caseload management-Closing ratio3
    • (Closing inventory >100 Cases): Winner – Netherlands (~47 %)
    • (Closing inventory within 20-100 Cases): Winner – Norway (~59 %)
  • Co-operation
    • (Transfer pricing cases): Winner – India & Japan
    • (Other cases): Winner – Australia & New Zealand
  • Most improved jurisdiction: Winner – United States (increase of 40 cases closed with unilateral relief or full agreement versus 2023, +31 TP cases and +9 other cases

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

On joint reading of the OECD’s APA statistics – 2024 alongside the APA Annual report issued CBDT for FY 2024-25, following are some of the key insights:

Indicators OECD 2024 All Jurisdiction CBDT Annual report for FY 24-25 India
APA to MAP Ratio 37.8% 50.2%
Closing Ratio 18.1%
Avg. time to conclude BAPA 39.60 Months 50.18 Months

The ratio of APA to MAP of India was higher as compared to the average of the all the OECD (Inclusive framework jurisdictions: 49 jurisdictions for APA and 144 jurisdictions for MAP), signifying progress in maturity of dispute resolution – movement towards dispute prevention from dispute resolution. With regard to the turnaround of the APA Bilateral program, as seen in closing ratio, India is nearing the OECD average, in light of marked increase in the number of APA concluded by the CBDT. Though there is a gap w.r.t. the average time to conclude APA, considering the recent progress witnessed in the APA program at large, it is expected that India would reach the OECD average time to APA and align with global best practices.

With regard to MAP cases, India witnessed an 8% decrease in the MAP case inventory as compared to the increase of 3% with the overall OECD jurisdictions. During 2024, the highest inventory of MAP applications and conclusions were with the United States. However, India concluded more than 80% of the 2024 opening inventory of MAP cases during 2024 with Japan, which was recognised through OECD’s award in the category of “Cooperation”.

Overall, the steady rise in both Bilateral and Unilateral APAs during FY 2024-25 reflects the strong trust taxpayers place in India’s APA programme and highlights the collaborative approach between taxpayers and authorities. As the programme evolves, there is a clear need to optimise procedures and encourage earlier filing of applications to make the agreements truly “advance,” to provide efficient and effective tax

3 The closing ratio measures the number of MAP/APA cases closed by each jurisdiction during the reporting year as compared its total MAP/APA caseload.

certainty. Greater information symmetry, timely responses, and proactive engagement from all parties have been key in accelerating resolutions, particularly in Bilateral APAs.

With one of the highest numbers of BAPAs signed since inception and continuous capacity building among taxpayers, consultants, APA teams, and Competent Authorities, the Indian APA programme has been maturing over the last few years. Leveraging the accumulated knowledge and experience, the focus now lies on streamlining processes, deepening international collaboration, and delivering timely, predictable outcomes furthering the programme’s goal of providing genuine tax certainty and stability to businesses operating in India.


About us

VSTN Consultancy is a Global Transfer Pricing firm with extensive expertise in the field of international taxation and transfer pricing. VSTN Consultancy has been awarded by International Tax Review (ITR) as Best Newcomer in Asia Pacific – 2024 and is ranked as one of the recommended transfer pricing firms. VSTN has also been nominated in 9 Categories under APAC, EMEA and Middle East Region ITR awards 2025. VSTN has its offices in India and Dubai.

Nithya Srinivasan, Founder of VSTN Consultancy, was named Middle East Transfer Pricing Practice Leader of the Year, recognizing her outstanding leadership and contribution to the profession. VSTN also received the Best Newcomer in the Middle East award from International Tax Review, showcasing its rapid growth and excellence in global transfer pricing advisory.

VSTN Consultancy has been honored with the Best Global Transfer Pricing Consultancy 2025 – India award at the prestigious Wealth & Finance Management Consulting Awards 2025.

Our offering spans the end-to-end Transfer Pricing value chain, including design of intercompany policy and drafting of Interco agreement, ensuring effective implementation of the Transfer Pricing policy, year-end documentation and certification, BEPS related compliances (including advisory, Masterfile, Country by Country report), safe harbour filing, audit defense before all forums and dispute prevention mechanisms such as Advance Pricing agreement. VSTNs senior partners have been ranked in ITR in the list of recognized Practitioners.

Locations Served

Australia Philippines
Belgium Singapore
Denmark Switzerland
India Turkey
Italy UAE
KSA UK
Mexico USA
Netherlands Zambia

Core Team

vstn

Nithya Srinivasan

Srilakshmi Hariharan

S Ranjani

E Rajesh

Nitya Joseph

Saranya Nagarajan

Triveni Palla

9:19:52/02:24.4

centest@vetmconsultancy.com

www.vstnconsultancy.com

Our Licensed Databases

SNo Database Provider
1 TP Catalyst Moody’s
2 ORBIS Moody’s
3 Loan Module Moody’s
4 IP & Royalty Data Moody’s
5 Royalty Rates and Benchmark Module ktMINE
6 Services CUT ktMINE
7 EDF-X Bond Database Moody’s
8 EDF-X Credit Risk Analytics Moody’s
9 Loan Module Royalty Range
10 Transfer Pricing Documenter (formerly Thomson Reuters Onesource) Ryan
11 Prowess CMIE

As businesses expand across borders, navigating complex transfer pricing regulations becomes critical. At VSTN Consultancy, a global transfer pricing firm, we specialize in helping companies stay compliant and competitive across key markets including:

India | UAE | USA | KSA | Dubai | Asia Pacific | Europe | Africa | North America

Whether you’re preparing for benchmarking intercompany transactions, or developing robust TP documentation, our team is here to support your international strategy and Compliance.

Contact us today to explore how we can partner with you to optimize your global transfer pricing approach.

#TransferPricing #TransferPricingFirm#VSTNConsultancy #TaxCompliance #IndiaUAEUSA

#TPExperts#TransferPricingExperts#GlobalTransferPricingFirm

Canada Budget 2025

CANADA BUDGET 2025: MODERNIZATION OF TRANSFER PRICING RULES

Canada’s Federal Budget 2025 introduces major amendments to the country’s Transfer Pricing framework, aiming to modernize section 247 of the Income Tax Act and align domestic rules more closely with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2022). These measures apply to taxation years beginning after November 4, 2025, and are expected to expand the scope of Canada’s TP regime. The detailed alert is enclosed.

Key Highlights:

  1. Substance over form: Transactions with non-resident related parties must now be evaluated not just on contractual terms but on actual conduct and ‘economically relevant characteristics’ – FAR profile, characteristics of the property/service, market scenario and business strategies.
  2. Consistency with OECD Guidelines: Canada will now require that the identification and adjustment of arm’s length conditions be made in a manner consistent with the OECD TP Guidelines (2022), unless otherwise prescribed. This incorporates international standards directly into domestic law.
  3. Applying the Most Appropriate Method: The requirement to apply the most appropriate transfer pricing method to determine whether the conditions of a transaction are at arm’s length, becomes a statutory rule.
  4. Transfer Pricing Adjustment rule: The CRA’s power to disregard or substitute transactions where actual conditions differ from arm’s length conditions has been expanded. While restricted to “exceptional circumstances,” the scope is broader than the current legislation.
  5. Key Administrative & Compliance changes:
    • The penalty threshold for transfer pricing adjustments has been increased from CAD 5 million to CAD 10 million, providing relief for smaller adjustments.
    • Taxpayers must provide transfer pricing documentation within 30 days of a CRA request, replacing the existing 3-month period and emphasizing the need for contemporaneous documentation.
    • Simplified documentation requirements will be introduced for eligible taxpayers, with detailed eligibility criteria yet to be prescribed.
    • Expansion of transfer pricing documentation requirements by aligning with updated definitions and the requirement to apply the most appropriate transfer pricing method.

These reforms mark a structural modernization of Canada’s TP regime, emphasizing economic substance, enhancing comparability standards, and potentially intensifying CRA’s audit scrutiny. MNEs with Canadian operations should reassess intercompany arrangements, refresh functional analyses, and tighten contemporaneous TP documentation processes in light of the new provisions.

Open Attachment…

Budget 2025: Modernization of Canada’s Transfer Pricing Rules

Summary

In the Federal Budget 2025 released on November 4, 2025, the Government of Canada announced significant amendments to the nation’s transfer pricing (TP) framework. The objective is to modernize Section 247 of the Income Tax Act (ITA), which sets out Canada’s transfer pricing rules, and to bring the regime into closer alignment with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2022) and the global practices relating to application of the arm’s length principle.

These measures build on the June 2023 consultation paper released by the Department of Finance, which sought public feedback following an announcement in Budget 2021 that amendments to Canada’s TP rules were under consideration, particularly in light of the Tax Court of Canada’s judgment in Cameco Corporation v. The Queen (2018 TCC 195, affirmed by the Federal Court of Appeal in 2020 FCA 112). The new proposals are expected to apply to taxation years beginning after Budget Day, i.e., November 4, 2025.

The proposed measures represent a comprehensive modernization of section 247, expanding the scope of Canada’s TP regime to focus on the economic reality of intercompany transactions, while tightening compliance timelines and introducing administrative changes.


Policy Objective

Canada’s existing TP rules seek to ensure that cross-border transactions between non-arm’s length parties – typically members of a multinational enterprise (MNE), reflect pricing arrangements that would have been agreed to between independent entities. The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has expressed concerns over the narrow judicial interpretations of section 247, limiting its ability to adjust transactions that diverge from arm’s length outcomes. As per the 2023 consultation paper, the government was of the view that the existing transfer pricing rules permit the shifting of excessive amounts of income out of Canada, which adversely affects the Canadian tax base.

The 2025 proposals respond to these concerns by establishing a broader TP framework focused on economic substance, consistent with the OECD Guidelines, along with enhanced administrative compliance. Budget documents project that the modernization of the TP regime, along with other international tax measures, could yield over CAD 500 million in additional revenue over five years.

Beyond revenue considerations, the reform also reflects Canada’s broader policy goal of aligning domestic tax administration with evolving global norms under the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) framework. By embedding OECD-consistent principles directly into the ITA, the government aims to

Best Newcomer APAC

Best Newcomer in the Middle East

Middle East Transfer Pricing Practice Leader

Recommended Firm Highly Regarded
Notable Practitioner Trusted Talent
Women in Tax Leader Recognised Firm

increase certainty for taxpayers while equipping the CRA with greater flexibility to address complex intercompany arrangements.

Key Amendments

1. Substance over form

Budget 2025 specifies that an analysis of transactions between a Canadian taxpayer and a non-resident non-arm’s length party must involve evaluation of whether the transaction includes actual conditions different from arm’s length conditions. The actual conditions are determined not only by contractual terms but also by considering ‘economically relevant characteristics’ which include the actual conduct of the party.

These economically relevant characteristics include the following five comparability factors, which are aligned with the OECD guidelines:

  • ✓ Contractual terms;
  • ✓ Functions performed, assets used, and risks assumed;
  • ✓ Characteristics of the property or service;
  • ✓ Economic and market context; and
  • ✓ Business strategies.

The framework emphasizes substance over form, requiring that the controlled transaction be assessed in light of the participants’ actual conduct and the full set of economically relevant characteristics, ensuring that transfer pricing analyses reflect economic reality rather than just legal documentation.

2. Consistency with OECD Guidelines

A new interpretive rule would require that the identification of arm’s length conditions and any resulting adjustments be made to best achieve consistency with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (as published on January 7, 2022), unless otherwise prescribed by regulation.

This ensures alignment with existing international standards while preserving flexibility for the government to prescribe other aspects through regulation.

3. Applying the Most Appropriate Method

The proposals introduce an explicit requirement that while determining whether the conditions of a controlled transaction are consistent with the arm’s length principle, one must apply the most appropriate transfer pricing method in accordance with the Transfer Pricing Guidelines (i.e. the OECD Guidelines or any text, as prescribed by the government). Although this reflects existing administrative practice, it would now become a legal requirement.

4. Transfer Pricing Adjustment rule

Under existing transfer pricing rules, when certain conditions are satisfied, an in-scope transaction may be replaced with the transaction that independent parties would have entered into at arm’s length under comparable terms and conditions.

As per the Budget 2025, where actual conditions differ from arm’s length conditions (the conditions that would have existed had the parties been dealing independently), the CRA may adjust amounts to reflect the appropriate arm’s length outcome. In exceptional cases, this could justify replacing or disregarding a transaction entirely, ensuring consistency with OECD guidance.

Under the new framework, the authority to disregard or substitute transactions would be incorporated directly into the broader definition of “arm’s length conditions”. While Budget 2025 emphasizes that this recharacterization should apply only in “exceptional circumstances,” consistent with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines and the interpretive rule, the revised approach still marks a clear expansion of the CRA’s authority compared to the current rules.

5. Key Administrative changes

Budget 2025 has introduced certain administrative changes to ensure efficient transfer pricing audits by the CRA as well as reduce compliance burden on taxpayers:

  • ✓ Higher Penalty Threshold: The threshold for applicability of transfer pricing penalty has been increased from a transfer pricing adjustment of CAD 5 million to CAD 10 million, providing some relief for smaller taxpayers/adjustments.
  • ✓ Faster Documentation submission: Taxpayers must provide transfer pricing documentation within 30 days of a CRA request, replacing the existing 3-month period, emphasizing the need for contemporaneous documentation. However, there is no change in the requirement to actually maintain the documentation by the tax return filing date for the respective year.
  • ✓ Simplified Documentation Regime: Simplified documentation requirements will be applicable for eligible taxpayers, thereby reducing their administrative burden. The conditions for eligibility are yet to be prescribed.
  • ✓ Aligning documentation requirements with the new changes: Clarifying transfer pricing documentation requirements and aligning them with updated definitions (including analysis of economically relevant characteristics, actual conduct of the parties and the requirement for selection of the most appropriate method). This would expand the existing documentation requirements to a great extent.

Conclusion

Budget 2025 marks a significant modernization of Canada’s transfer pricing framework, embedding OECD-aligned principles such as economic substance, comparability factors, and exceptional-case non-recognition directly into domestic law. While the arm’s length principle remains central, the proposals expand the CRA’s analytical scope, emphasize substance over form, and introduce stricter compliance requirements, including shortened documentation timelines; which may result in intensified audit scrutiny.

Multinational enterprises with Canadian operations should use the transition period before these rules take effect, for taxation years beginning after November 4, 2025, to review intercompany arrangements, update documentation processes, and ensure that pricing structures and functional analyses align with the updated OECD-consistent framework. Proactive preparation will be essential to navigate a more rigorous, substance-driven transfer pricing environment and to minimize exposure to adjustments or penalties.

Sources:

  • Canada Strong Budget 2025 [https://budget.canada.ca/2025/home-accueil-en.html]
  • Tax Measures: Supplementary Information [https://budget.canada.ca/2025/report-rapport/tm-mf-en.html]
  • Consultation on Reforming and Modernizing Canada’s Transfer Pricing Rules [https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/programs/consultations/2023/transfer-pricing-consultation/consultation-on-reforming-and-modernizing-canadas-transfer-pricing-rules.html]

About us

VSTN Consultancy is a Global Transfer Pricing firm with extensive expertise in the field of international taxation and transfer pricing. VSTN Consultancy has been awarded by International Tax Review (ITR) as Best Newcomer in Asia Pacific – 2024 and is ranked as one of the recommended transfer pricing firms. VSTN has also been nominated in 9 Categories under APAC, EMEA and Middle East Region ITR awards 2025. VSTN has its offices in India and Dubai.

Nithya Srinivasan, Founder of VSTN Consultancy, was named Middle East Transfer Pricing Practice Leader of the Year, recognizing her outstanding leadership and contribution to the profession. VSTN also received the Best Newcomer in the Middle East award from International Tax Review, showcasing its rapid growth and excellence in global transfer pricing advisory.

VSTN Consultancy has been honored with the Best Global Transfer Pricing Consultancy 2025 – India award at the prestigious Wealth & Finance Management Consulting Awards 2025.

Our offering spans the end-to-end Transfer Pricing value chain, including design of intercompany policy and drafting of Interco agreement, ensuring effective implementation of the Transfer Pricing policy, year-end documentation and certification, BEPS related compliances (including advisory, Masterfile, Country by Country report), safe harbour filing, audit defense before all forums and dispute prevention mechanisms such as Advance Pricing agreement. VSTNs senior partners have been ranked in ITR in the list of recognized Practitioners.

Locations Served

Australia Philippines
Belgium Singapore
Denmark Switzerland
India Turkey
Italy UAE
KSA UK
Mexico USA
Netherlands Zambia

Core Team

vstn

Nithya Srinivasan

Srilakshmi Hariharan

S Ranjani

E Rajesh

Nitya Joseph

Saranya Nagarajan

Triveni Palla

9:19:52/02:24.4

centest@vetmconsultancy.com

www.vstnconsultancy.com

Our Licensed Databases

SNo Database Provider
1 TP Catalyst Moody’s
2 ORBIS Moody’s
3 Loan Module Moody’s
4 IP & Royalty Data Moody’s
5 Royalty Rates and Benchmark Module ktMINE
6 Services CUT ktMINE
7 EDF-X Bond Database Moody’s
8 EDF-X Credit Risk Analytics Moody’s
9 Loan Module Royalty Range
10 Transfer Pricing Documenter (formerly Thomson Reuters Onesource) Ryan
11 Prowess CMIE

As businesses expand across borders, navigating complex transfer pricing regulations becomes critical. At VSTN Consultancy, a global transfer pricing firm, we specialize in helping companies stay compliant and competitive across key markets including:

India | UAE | USA | KSA | Dubai | Asia Pacific | Europe | Africa | North America

Whether you’re preparing for benchmarking intercompany transactions, or developing robust TP documentation, our team is here to support your international strategy and Compliance.

Contact us today to explore how we can partner with you to optimize your global transfer pricing approach.

#TransferPricing #TransferPricingFirm#VSTNConsultancy #TaxCompliance #IndiaUAEUSA

#TPExperts#TransferPricingExperts#GlobalTransferPricingFirm

Recent Posts
  • APA Annual Report
  • Canada Budget 2025
  • VSTN – New Office – Dubai
  • Indian HQ MNEs with UK entities: Pillar Two
  • Tax Connect Newsletter – UAE Transfer Pricing
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • August 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    Categories
    • Transfer Pricing
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Consult Visionary Solutions Transferpricing Network (VSTN) for your needs.

    Contact Us
    Global Transfer Pricing Firm

    +91 99620 12244
    +971 58 305 3317
    +966 54 558 6029
    contact@vstnconsultancy.com

    VSTN Consultancy © 2025. All Rights Reserved.