Global Transfer Pricing Firm
(IND) +91 99620 12244
(UAE) +971 58 305 3317
contact@vstnconsultancy.com
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Why Choose Us
    • Industries We Serve
    • Who We Are
    • Our Team
  • Our Services
    • Transfer Pricing Advisory
    • Benchmarking
    • Due Diligence
    • BEPS Related Services
    • Safe Harbour
    • TP Documentation
    • Litigation
    • Advance Pricing Agreement
    • Key Managerial Personnel – KMP
    • Benchmarking Financial Transactions – Loan
    • Benchmarking Intangible Transactions – Royalty
    • Need Benefit Analysis Documentation
    • Related Party Compliances
    • Pillar 1 & Pillar 2 Impact Analysis
    • Other Services
  • Company Profile
  • INSIGHTS
    • Articles
    • ACCA Approved Employer
    • News
    • Photo Gallery
    • Events
    • Sitemap
  • Recognition
  • Careers
  • Contact US
Global Transfer Pricing Firm
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Why Choose Us
    • Industries We Serve
    • Who We Are
    • Our Team
  • Our Services
    • Transfer Pricing Advisory
    • Benchmarking
    • Due Diligence
    • BEPS Related Services
    • Safe Harbour
    • TP Documentation
    • Litigation
    • Advance Pricing Agreement
    • Key Managerial Personnel – KMP
    • Benchmarking Financial Transactions – Loan
    • Benchmarking Intangible Transactions – Royalty
    • Need Benefit Analysis Documentation
    • Related Party Compliances
    • Pillar 1 & Pillar 2 Impact Analysis
    • Other Services
  • Company Profile
  • INSIGHTS
    • Articles
    • ACCA Approved Employer
    • News
    • Photo Gallery
    • Events
    • Sitemap
  • Recognition
  • Careers
  • Contact US

VSTN Transfer Pricing Update | Series – 3

VSTN Transfer Pricing Update | Series – 3: Decoding the New Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) Rules 2026

This third newsletter  in our series on the Draft Income-tax Rules, 2026 focuses on the key amendments to India’s APA framework, highlighting important procedural, structural and compliance changes across the APA process.

Key changes include

  1. Reassignment of Authority to the PCIT
  2. Uniform APA filing fee of INR 20 lakh replacing the earlier slab-based structure
  3. Pre-filing consultation not applicable for renewal cases
  4. Separate form introduced for renewal applications (Form 54)
  5. Rectification timeline for defective applications rationalised to 30 days from 15 days
  6. Unilateral APA proceedings to be completed within one year from the end of the FY of admission, where possible
  7. Prescribed conclusion timelines for APA proceedings:
    1. 3 years for non-IT/ITeS cases
    2. 2 years for IT/ITeS cases
  8. Board empowered to close cases for non-compliance if not concluded within the prescribed timeline
  9. Rollback integrated into the main APA application (Form 51), with no separate rollback form

Overall, the draft rules indicate a clear move towards standardisation, digitisation, defined timelines and enhanced reporting discipline within the APA regime.

More insights on other transfer pricing changes under the Draft Income-tax Rules, 2026 to follow in the next instalment of this series.

Open Attachment…

Draft Income-tax Rules 2026 – Update on APA Rules

Recommended Firm | Highly Regarded | Notable Practitioner | Trusted Talent | Women In Tax Leader | Recognised Firm |

Background

The draft Income-tax Rules, 2026 (“Draft rules”) have recently been released by CBDT and are open for public comments until 22 February 2026. As part of the new framework, the draft rules relating to Advance Pricing Agreements (APA) have been notified and are proposed to replace the existing APA rules under the Income-tax Rules, 1962.

The APA mechanism is a prospective transfer pricing certainty tool that enables taxpayers to agree in advance with the tax authorities on the arm’s length pricing methodology for specified international transactions for a fixed period.

The existing regime prescribes detailed procedures covering application, pre-filing consultation, negotiation, execution of the agreement, annual compliance reporting, compliance audit by the Transfer Pricing Officer, interaction with the Mutual Agreement Procedure in bilateral or multilateral cases, and tax relief mechanisms arising from APA adjustments, including secondary adjustments. It operates through prescribed forms, defined timelines, and a structured administrative process involving the APA authorities, Competent Authority, jurisdictional officers, and the TPO.

The draft Rules propose a restructuring of the APA framework, including realignment of rule references with the new Act, substitution and renumbering of prescribed forms, rationalisation of certain procedural requirements, modifications to prescribed fees and timelines, and other structural and drafting changes in reporting and processes.

The key changes are discussed in detail in the ensuing paragraphs.

Key changes in new APA rules

Key changes in the Draft rules in respect of APA are provided below:

  1. The authority is assigned to Principal Commissioner of Income Tax as against Director General of Income Tax in the existing rules
  2. APA filing fee – the existing tier-based structure, is replaced with a standard fee of INR 20 lakh irrespective of the value of international transactions. Pursuant to this, in case of any amendment in the APA application which results in increase in value of international transactions, there may not be any impact on the application fee paid
  3. It is clarified that pre-filing consultation is not applicable in cases of renewal of APA
  4. The existing form No. 3CEE is scrapped and accordingly “Withdrawal of APA application” can be done through an intimation letter, thereby simplifies the procedure
  5. The timeline for rectification of defective application has been now rationalised to 30 days
  6. Rollback –
    • a. There is no separate form to be filed for Rollback of APA. However additional fee of INR 5 lakhs remains;
    • b. The option to cover the prior years under APA is now subsumed in the main APA application i.e., Form 51;
    • c. Under the existing rules, the applicant was allowed to file rollback application anytime during the process of the APA, however under the New Draft rules, the same is not explicitly mentioned.
  7. The proceedings upon filing the application i.e., holding meetings with applicant, calling for documents / information through questionnaires, site visit, making any inquiries is mandated to be completed within one year from the end of the FY in which application is allowed to be proceeded with. While it will significantly bring down the protracted timelines, the usage of the term “where it is possible” may provide some leeway for the authorities in adhering to this rule
  8. Conclusion of Unilateral APA
    APA Timeline
    Other than IT/ITeS cases Three years from the end of the FY in which the application was filed
    IT/ITeS cases Two years from the end of the FY in which the application was filed
  9. It is interesting to note that the Board may direct closure of cases if the agreement is not entered into within the aforementioned timeline, on account of non-compliance by the applicant. While this change would result in structured completion of APA cases, there is lack of clarity on the repercussions caused on account of the delay in proceedings by the authorities.
  10. In respect of Annual compliance report (“ACR”), vide notification No. 03/2022, the filing was made online. However in the draft rules it is mentioned that the PCIT to share one copy each to Competent authority, Commissioner of Income Tax and Jurisdictional TPO. Hence one may need to await the final rules to understand the process of filing the ACR i.e., whether online or manual.
  11. Application for Renewal of agreement to be file vide a separate form i.e., Form No. 54.
  12. Bilateral / Multilateral APA acceptance timeline – The applicant can convey the acceptance or otherwise to the competent authority within one month from the end of the month in which the communication has been received (as against 30 days from the date of communication)

The forms to be filed in connection with the APA process have undergone change. The form numbers and their corresponding changes as per the New Draft Rules is as below:

Purpose Form No as per IT Rules 1962 Form No as per New Draft Rules 2026
Pre filing consultation Form No. 3CEC Form No. 50
Application for APA Form No. 3CED Form No. 51
Annual Compliance report Form No. 3CEF Form No. 52
Renewal of APA No separate Form. To be filed vide Form No. 3CED Form No. 54

The key changes are captured below.

Common pointers across all forms:

  • The overall structure of the form has been modified wherein the information is sought in the form of tabular columns, divided into Part A & Part B, annexures, etc.
  • The form is required to be filed online, wherein certain particulars of the form are expected to be pre-filled
  • Mandatory disclosure of Tax identification number of the applicant

Specific changes

A. Pre-filing consultation – Form No. 50

The form is simplified wherein the following contents are removed from the existing Form 3CEC:

  • Identification of third party comparable;
  • Arm’s length price / profit level indicator computation details
  • Details of critical assumptions
  • The history of the Competent Authority issues, requests and settlements

B. Application for APA – Form No. 51

  • The form subsumes application for forward looking as well as for the rollback years;
  • The details of business locations of the Applicant along with the employee headcount is required to be provided;
  • The form requires the result of application of proposed TPMs to the covered transactions for the 5 prior years’ operations and the time period applicant wants to cover in APA as against the 3 years in Form 3CED. Further the discussion and the quantification of the variance between existing and proposed TPM of those 5 years also to be provided;

C. Annual Compliance Report – Form No. 52

  • The details of adjustment is required to be disclosed in a structured manner wherein the manner of computation of adjustment in case of respective PLI (i.e., OP/OC or OP/OI) is provided explicitly;
  • In Form 3CEF, a general field seeking the applicant to demonstrate that the applicant had fulfilled all other terms & conditions of the APA without any specific mention of terms. However, in the new form, the following are explicitly sought to be presented:
    • Details on Invoicing and Credit terms including frequency of raising invoices by applicant/AE, adherence to the timeline as mentioned in the APA, payment / realisation of invoice as agreed in the APA, whether interest is offered in case of any delay;
    • Compliance with provisions relating to Secondary adjustment (Sec. 170) and interest deductions (sec. 177);
    • Confirmation on the preparation of segmental accounts, if applicable;
    • Certification from Chartered Accountant / Management accountant / Chartered Engineer etc., as applicable;
    • Confirmation on maintenance / furnishing of documentations, if any, as specified in the APA;

D. Renewal of APA – Form No. 54

  • The main APA application form is replicated for renewal with the following inclusions:
  • Acknowledgment number of the original APA filed
  • Question on changes, if any, with regard to the information submitted in respect of the main APA application

It is interesting to note that the details of Roll back (fee, roll back years, etc.,) are also retained in the form. However the same may not be applicable in case of renewal. Perhaps the same might be removed in the final rules.

Key Takeaways

The draft APA rules under the Income-tax Rules, 2026 represent a structured refinement of the existing framework rather than a substantive policy shift. The changes focus on administrative realignment, procedural simplification, standardisation of fees, and introduction of clearer timelines, particularly for unilateral APAs. While certain formalities have been streamlined, the fundamental architecture and intent of the APA programme remain intact.

Since rollback is subsumed in the main APA application itself, the procedure for withdrawal of rollback during the APA process is unclear at present. If the same is not entertained, one may need to strategize the APA, whether to avail the rollback provisions or not, well in advance to avoid any probable hassle.

While the defined timelines for APA conclusion is a welcome move, it calls for greater preparedness from the applicant’s side in ensuring timely action towards filing response to the questionnaires, cooperation with the APA authorities during the site visits, etc.

The flat fee structure and removal of certain procedural requirements reduce administrative complexity but also place greater emphasis on strategic planning before filing or seeking amendments


About us

VSTN Consultancy is a Global Transfer Pricing firm with extensive expertise in the field of international taxation and transfer pricing. VSTN Consultancy has been awarded by International Tax Review (ITR) as Best Newcomer in Asia Pacific – 2024 and is ranked as one of the recommended transfer pricing firms. VSTN has also been nominated in 9 Categories under APAC, EMEA and Middle East Region ITR awards 2025. VSTN has its offices in India and Dubai.

Nithya Srinivasan, Founder of VSTN Consultancy, was named Middle East Transfer Pricing Practice Leader of the Year, recognizing her outstanding leadership and contribution to the profession. VSTN also received the Best Newcomer in the Middle East award from International Tax Review, showcasing its rapid growth and excellence in global transfer pricing advisory.

VSTN Consultancy has been honored with the Best Global Transfer Pricing Consultancy 2025 – India award at the prestigious Wealth & Finance Management Consulting Awards 2025.

Our offering spans the end-to-end Transfer Pricing value chain, including design of intercompany policy and drafting of Interco agreement, ensuring effective implementation of the Transfer Pricing policy, year-end documentation and certification, BEPS related compliances (including advisory, Masterfile, Country by Country report), safe harbour filing, audit defense before all forums and dispute prevention mechanisms such as Advance Pricing agreement. VSTNs senior partners have been ranked in ITR in the list of recognized Practitioners.

Locations Served

Australia Philippines
Belgium Singapore
Denmark Switzerland
India Turkey
Italy UAE
KSA UK
Mexico USA
Netherlands Zambia

Core Team

vstn

Nithya Srinivasan

Srilakshmi Hariharan

S Ranjani

E Rajesh

Nitya Joseph

Saranya Nagarajan

Triveni Palla

9:19:52/02:24.4

centest@vetmconsultancy.com

www.vstnconsultancy.com

Our Licensed Databases

SNo Database Provider
1 TP Catalyst Moody’s
2 ORBIS Moody’s
3 Loan Module Moody’s
4 IP & Royalty Data Moody’s
5 Royalty Rates and Benchmark Module ktMINE
6 Services CUT ktMINE
7 EDF-X Bond Database Moody’s
8 EDF-X Credit Risk Analytics Moody’s
9 Loan Module Royalty Range
10 Transfer Pricing Documenter (formerly Thomson Reuters Onesource) Ryan
11 Prowess CMIE

As businesses expand across borders, navigating complex transfer pricing regulations becomes critical. At VSTN Consultancy, a global transfer pricing firm, we specialize in helping companies stay compliant and competitive across key markets including:

India | UAE | Singapore | USA | KSA | Dubai | Asia Pacific | Europe | Africa | North America

Whether you’re preparing for benchmarking intercompany transactions, or developing robust TP documentation, our team is here to support your international strategy and Compliance.

Contact us today to explore how we can partner with you to optimize your global transfer pricing approach.

#TransferPricing #TransferPricingFirm#VSTNConsultancy #TaxCompliance #IndiaUAEUSA

#TPExperts#TransferPricingExperts#GlobalTransferPricingFirm

VSTN Transfer Pricing Update | Series – 2

VSTN Transfer Pricing Update | Series – 2: Decoding the New Safe Harbour Rules

This second alert on draft Income Tax Rules, 2026 turns the spotlight on the key amendments to India’s Safe Harbour Rules, unpacking how the updated definitions, eligibility conditions, and compliance timelines reshape the landscape for eligible assessees.

Introduction of Form 49

1. Streamlined Compliance: A single Form (Form 49) now replaces multiple legacy forms (Form 3CEFA, 3CEFB & 3CEFC), consolidating the entire Safe Harbour application into one unified filing
2. Form 49 timelines- IT services get flexibility (file anytime in Tax Year 1 or up to 30 June of following year). For all other categories, the deadline stays tied to the ITR due date
3. Form 49 introduces a simplified structure by grouping all safe harbour transactions into three broad buckets- Eligible International transactions, Eligible SDT, & Eligible businesses
4.The new form brings in threshold‑driven confirmations for specified transactions, marking a shift from the earlier forms that did not mandate such disclosures.
5.Additional requirement to upload the accountant’s certificate certifying the cost pool allocation in relation to receipt of Low value adding Intra Group services

Key Safe Harbour Reforms

In line with the safe harbour reforms introduced in the Budget, relevant updates have been incorporated in the draft IT Rules

1. Separate, simplified rule now introduced exclusively for the SH procedure relating to IT services, along with automated verification process
2. Responsibility for identifying “low-risk” players has moved from AO/TPO to DGIT (Systems) for IT, ITeS, and KPO—replacing manual scrutiny with automated, tech-driven validation
3. Unified Margin with increase in threshold: All IT services (Software, ITeS, KPO, R&D for SWD) merged into a single category with a reduced 15.5% SH margin accompanied by a substantial raise in threshold to ₹2,000 Crore, bringing more mid-sized firms into the fold.
4. 5-Year Lock-in: Once applied, the safe harbour for IT services can be continued for 5 consecutive years.
5. New Sector Incentives: SH rates of 15% margin on cost for Data Centres and 2% of gross receipts for custom bonded warehousing.

More alerts related to the other transfer pricing aspects in the draft Income Tax Rules to follow in next instalment of this series.

Open Attachment…

Draft Income Tax Rules – Update on Safe Harbour Rules

1) Provision of IT services*; 2) Others: – Provision of contract R&D services wholly or partly relating to generic pharmaceutical drugs – Manufacturing & export of core auto components – Manufacturing & export of non-core auto components – Provision of data centre services (NEW) – Advancing intra-group loans by eligible assessee – Providing corporate guarantee by eligible assessee – Receipt of low value-adding intra-group services

*Common category for Software development, ITeS, KPO & Contract R&D in relation to software development

Changes in Form No.49

Particulars Additional requirements
1. IT services Tax Years for which option is to be exercised to be included
2. Transaction categories Clubbing of 4 service categories into IT services, inclusion of Data centre services and Eligible business of component storage in bonded warehouses
3. Advancing of intra-group loans • If the loan is in foreign currency, there is a checkbox requirement (Yes/No) to confirm whether the total loan advanced to all AEs exceeds INR 250 crores as on 31st March of the tax year
• In cases where credit rating is not available and the loan is in Indian currency, there is a checkbox requirement (Yes/No) to confirm that the total loan advanced to all AEs does not exceed INR 100 crores to determine the eligibility.
4. Provision of Corporate Guarantee • Checkbox requirement (Yes/No) to confirm whether the amount guaranteed exceeds INR 100 crores
• Further, AE credit rating and credit rating agency to be disclosed only if amount guaranteed exceeds INR 100 cr.
Particulars Additional requirements
5. Receipt of low value-adding intra-group services Checkbox requirement (Yes/No) to confirm if the value of transactions including markup ≤ 5% exceeds INR 10 crores, to determine eligibility for SH
Additional requirement to upload the accountant’s certificate certifying the cost pool allocation
Specific requirement to disclose the Date and UDIN of accountant’s certificate
Amount of EIT excluding mark-up and amount of EIT including mark-up to be separately shown
6. ESDT (Supply of electricity or transmission of electricity or wheeling of electricity) The old form required details of relevant order of the Appropriate Commission determining the tariff or approving the methodology for determination of the tariff, whereas the new form specifically asks for the date, type and validity of such order
7. ESDT (Purchase of milk and milk products) Earlier, taxpayers were required to furnish exhaustive details regarding the quantity, rate, and milk-equivalent of dairy products purchased, along with verification of uniform payment to members. Such granular details are no longer required in Form 49.
Instead, Form 49 seeks procedural confirmations on whether the procurement rate is fixed based on quality (SNF content) and is independent of milk volume, shareholding, and voting power of the members.
8. Eligible business (sale of raw diamonds and component storage in bonded warehouse) Confirmation (yes/no) that:
– No further deduction under section 28 to 34, 44 to 49, 51,52, Schedule IX and X has been claimed
– Written down value of assets is deemed to have been calculated as if the assessee had claimed the depreciation
– No set off of unabsorbed depreciation under section 33(11) or carried forward loss under section 112(1) has been claimed
– No set off of loss from other business under section 108(1) or other head under section 109 has been claimed

Hence, the new form outlines the mandatory deduction and set-off restrictions applicable when opting for SH for EB. These restrictive provisions are designed to ensure that the profit% of 4%/2% is final, preventing taxpayers from further reducing their taxable income through additional claims

New Rule 91 on SH procedure for IT services

A separate, simplified rule has now been introduced exclusively for the SH procedure relating to IT services. Under the earlier framework, the procedural requirements for all eligible international transactions were consolidated within a single rule, without distinction between different categories. The new structure therefore streamlines compliance by carving out a dedicated procedure specifically for IT services, as promised by the 2026 Budget. The key provisions are outlined below:

1. Duration

  • Once exercised validly, the SH remains in force for 5 consecutive tax years.
  • If an Assessee withdraws their option (by furnishing a declaration), they cannot re-exercise it until the original 5-year period expires.

2. Application filing

  • Form No. 49 to be submitted and verified electronically (Digital Signature or EVC) to the DGIT (Systems).
  • Must be filed during the first tax year and not beyond 30th June of the following year

3. Automated verification & approval process

  • The system verifies if the assessee and transactions are ‘eligible’ and the option is valid.
  • Acceptance or rejection will be communicated within two months from the end of the filing month.
  • Application will be rejected only upon providing specific reasons and after giving an opportunity to the assessee to rectify any identified defects.

4. Annual compliance

  • For each of the four years following the first year, a statement detailing quantum of eligible transactions and profit margins achieved must be filed before filing the tax return (Format of the statement yet to be specified).
  • Upon acceptance, the assessee must file tax returns for each of the 5 years as per SH provisions on or before the due date for filing return of income
  • The Assessing Officer can make reference to the TPO for transactions other than the eligible IT services covered by the SH.

Further it is specified that the DGIT (Systems) with the approval of CBDT can lay down any further data structure, formats or procedures in connection with furnishing/verification of the above documents, including any required modifications.

For an assessee to qualify as an eligible assessee in respect of IT services, the conditions relating to assumption of only insignificant risks and the foreign principal performing the economically significant functions will continue to apply. In this context, actual conduct takes precedence over contractual terms.

The responsibility to determine whether an assessee is an eligible assessee, bearing insignificant risk, for contract R&D lies with AO or TPO or DGIT (systems) whereas it has been shifted from AO/TPO to DGIT (Systems) for software development, ITeS & KPO services.

Note: As the new category of Data center services are not covered under the provision of IT services, one has to follow the general procedures relating to the other eligible transactions, which involve verification of the SH Application by tax authorities.

Relaxation in Accountant definition

To support the government’s vision of home-grown accounting and advisory firms to become global leaders, the definition of Accountant for the purposes of SH Rules has been rationalised, as announced in the Budget. The definition of Accountant is relied in the SH Rules only in connection with the management services safe harbor, for certification of the cost pool. The earlier rule provided a preference to Global firms for the certification as it requires the firm certifying the same to be present in more than 2 countries.

Currently the requirement to have presence in more than two countries has been removed for Indian Chartered Accountants who are members or partners in accountancy or valuation services entities. This condition is now applicable only in the case of persons recognised for undertaking cost certification by the Government of the country where the associated enterprise is registered or incorporated or any of its agencies.

Further the revenue threshold to be fulfilled by an Accountant has been relaxed:

  • Accountant pursuing the profession of accountancy individually or is a valuer – Annual professional receipts in the year preceding the year in which cost certification is undertaken > INR 50 lakhs (Old rule- Rs. 1 crore);
  • Member or partner in an accountancy or valuation services entity – Annual receipt of the entity in the year preceding the year in which cost certification is undertaken > INR 3 crores (Old rule- Rs. 10 crores).

2026-27 and shall continue to apply for subsequent block periods, unless modified. However, for transactions other than IT services, the SH application in Form No. 49 will still need to be filed for each individual year.

Further, with updates to the SH Rules as per Budget 2026, the corresponding changes have been incorporated in the SH rates in the draft Rules:

Particulars PLI/Base Old rate New rate
1. Software development service Operating profit / Operating expense (OP/OE) 17% if transaction value ≤ INR 100 crores,
18% if transaction value > INR 100 crores but ≤ INR 300 crores
Consolidated rate of 15.5% for IT services, if aggregate operating revenue ≤ INR 2,000 crores in the tax year
2. IT enabled services
3. Knowledge processing outsourcing services
4. Contract R&D relating to software development
5. Data centre services OP/OE –
6. Eligible business of storage of components in a bonded warehouse for sale to a contract manufacturer Gross Receipts – Profits and gains chargeable to tax shall be ≥ 2%

New / Updated definitions

The following definitions have been included in connection with SH in the new Rules:

Data centre and Data centre services, Contract manufacturer, Custom bonded area, Eligible assessee, Eligible business, Gross receipts and Specified electronic goods in connection with the business activity of storage of components in a warehouse in a custom bonded area for sale to a contract manufacturer.

Key considerations

More clarity is needed on whether SH for IT services can be opted for a period shorter than five years, or if only a continuous 5 year term is permitted. More guidance is also required on whether, if the assessee withdraws from the Safe Harbour regime for IT services during the 5 year period, such withdrawal will have retrospective effect or apply only prospectively to future years. As the cost allocation certificate for low value-adding services must be filed together with the SH form, it should be obtained in advance. Timely coordination with the AE’s location will be required to obtain the certificate. Under the current and prior SH Rules, five factors must be assessed to determine whether an Assessee qualifies as an eligible Assessee with insignificant risk. It remains to be seen how this will be implemented in practice, in the case of IT service providers where the verification process has now become automated.


About us

VSTN Consultancy is a Global Transfer Pricing firm with extensive expertise in the field of international taxation and transfer pricing. VSTN Consultancy has been awarded by International Tax Review (ITR) as Best Newcomer in Asia Pacific – 2024 and is ranked as one of the recommended transfer pricing firms. VSTN has also been nominated in 9 Categories under APAC, EMEA and Middle East Region ITR awards 2025. VSTN has its offices in India and Dubai.

Nithya Srinivasan, Founder of VSTN Consultancy, was named Middle East Transfer Pricing Practice Leader of the Year, recognizing her outstanding leadership and contribution to the profession. VSTN also received the Best Newcomer in the Middle East award from International Tax Review, showcasing its rapid growth and excellence in global transfer pricing advisory.

VSTN Consultancy has been honored with the Best Global Transfer Pricing Consultancy 2025 – India award at the prestigious Wealth & Finance Management Consulting Awards 2025.

Our offering spans the end-to-end Transfer Pricing value chain, including design of intercompany policy and drafting of Interco agreement, ensuring effective implementation of the Transfer Pricing policy, year-end documentation and certification, BEPS related compliances (including advisory, Masterfile, Country by Country report), safe harbour filing, audit defense before all forums and dispute prevention mechanisms such as Advance Pricing agreement. VSTNs senior partners have been ranked in ITR in the list of recognized Practitioners.

Locations Served

Australia Philippines
Belgium Singapore
Denmark Switzerland
India Turkey
Italy UAE
KSA UK
Mexico USA
Netherlands Zambia

Core Team

vstn

Nithya Srinivasan

Srilakshmi Hariharan

S Ranjani

E Rajesh

Nitya Joseph

Saranya Nagarajan

Triveni Palla

9:19:52/02:24.4

centest@vetmconsultancy.com

www.vstnconsultancy.com

Our Licensed Databases

SNo Database Provider
1 TP Catalyst Moody’s
2 ORBIS Moody’s
3 Loan Module Moody’s
4 IP & Royalty Data Moody’s
5 Royalty Rates and Benchmark Module ktMINE
6 Services CUT ktMINE
7 EDF-X Bond Database Moody’s
8 EDF-X Credit Risk Analytics Moody’s
9 Loan Module Royalty Range
10 Transfer Pricing Documenter (formerly Thomson Reuters Onesource) Ryan
11 Prowess CMIE

As businesses expand across borders, navigating complex transfer pricing regulations becomes critical. At VSTN Consultancy, a global transfer pricing firm, we specialize in helping companies stay compliant and competitive across key markets including:

India | UAE | Singapore | USA | KSA | Dubai | Asia Pacific | Europe | Africa | North America

Whether you’re preparing for benchmarking intercompany transactions, or developing robust TP documentation, our team is here to support your international strategy and Compliance.

Contact us today to explore how we can partner with you to optimize your global transfer pricing approach.

#TransferPricing #TransferPricingFirm#VSTNConsultancy #TaxCompliance #IndiaUAEUSA

#TPExperts#TransferPricingExperts#GlobalTransferPricingFirm

KSA- Transfer Pricing Landscape

KSA- Transfer Pricing Landscape

As the transfer pricing is an evolving subject in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, it is imperative for the taxpayers in KSA to focus on the annual compliance requirements. With the inclusion of 100% Zakat payers in the purview transfer pricing Bylaws applicability, the ZATCA has sent a clear indication to include more taxpayers in the TP Bylaws. This is more evident from the applicability of TP Bylaws to RHQs.  

The KSA TP Bylaws has a robust documentation requirement including disclosure forms and affidavits supported by the basic general documentation which are mandatory for all the taxpayers under the TP Bylaws. The KSA also requires the taxpayers to maintain additional documentation if the taxpayers meet certain monetary threshold. Though the KSA TP Bylaws does not provide the safe harbour option, the taxpayers can get certainty through APA.

Further the alert also focusses on the transfer pricing considerations #RHQs should bear in mind while claiming the tax exemption.

The Flyer touches all the above aspects while highlighting the compliance requirements for each category of taxpayers.

Do reach out to VSTN in case of any queries or support in KSA. 

Open Attachment…

KSA Transfer Pricing Flyer Overview of TP compliances

Kingdon of Saudi Arabia had introduced transfer pricing Bylaws in the year 2019. The Bylaws were constantly updated to include more persons under the purview of transfer pricing regulations of KSA from time to time aligned with the OECD guidelines. The Bylaws lays down the detailed guidance on the applicability, covered persons, covered transactions and approach for determining arm’s length criteria of the controlled transactions, a framework to set prices for Controlled Transactions, including but not limited to transfers of goods, services, loans and Intangibles (intellectual property). Besides loans, other financial transactions are also covered in this Guideline, for instance, guarantees, factoring and hedging

The following persons are covered under the TP Bylaws of the KSA covering both the domestic and cross border transactions:

  • Taxpayers subject to 100% income tax
  • Mixed Companies to the extent that the Mixed Company is subject to income tax in the Kingdom.
  • 100% Zakat Payers
  • Small Enterprises, investment funds, and wholly government – owned companies that are exempt from Zakat collection

Identify of Related Persons

Related persons means two or more natural persons having relation or partnership

A natural person is related to juridical person in case of either him or his related person together exercises controls (directly or indirectly or both) voting rights income or capital of a company or partnership or juridical person Two juridical persons are related when there is a common control on them, one controls the other or the persons having effective control over them are related

Identification and delineation of controlled transactions

  • Broad- based analyses including the industry sector and other relevant items of the MNE Group such as business strategies, supply chain and key functions assets and risks
  • In depth- analysis including the determine the contractual terms of the Transaction; Functional and Risk Analysis for each Related Person part of the Controlled Transaction; Characteristics of the property transferred, or services provided; The economic circumstances of the market in which the Related Persons operate; and the Business strategies pursued by the Related Persons
  • Determination of most appropriate method and its application to determine the uncontrolled transactions

Documentation

In general, the KSA transfer pricing guidelines and Bylaws impose four documentation requirements i.e., Disclosure Form and Affidavit, General documentation, Local File, Master File and Country- by- Country Report

Implementation

  • Reporting of the Controlled Transactions in the commercial accounts based on the existing accounting rules in the KSA
  • Making Periodical adjustments and year- end adjustments before filing the tax return as all Controlled Transactions must be reported in the Disclosure Form and the tax returns in accordance with the Arm’s Length Principle
  • KSA will only allow a downward corresponding adjustment if there is a DTA in place

Compliance Requirement Natural Person 100% Zakat payers Taxable person subject to 100% income tax / Mixed Companies Due date Penalty
TP Bylaws No Yes Yes — —
Disclosure Form & Affidavit No Yes Yes Within 120 days from the end of fiscal year i.e. Calendar Year Incorrect Disclosure Forms: SAR 100,000 – SAR 500,000.
General TP Documentation No Yes Yes On request from the Authority – Within 30 Calendar days —
Local File Yes. Aggregate Value of Related Party Transactions till 2027: Yes. Aggregate Value of Related Party Transactions ≥ SAR 6 million annually Yes. Aggregate Value of Related Party Transactions ≥ SAR 6 billion annually On request from the Authority – Within 30 Calendar days Penalty for Late/Missing Documentation (Local/Master File): SAR 50,000 – SAR 100,000 per violation. Tax Evasion via TP Manipulation: A penalty of SAR 1 million, plus 300% of the tax difference.
Master File No Aggregate Value of Related Party Transactions after 2027 > SAR 48 million Yes. If the consolidated group revenue is ≥ SAR 3,200,000,000 (approx. EUR 750 million) in the reporting year immediately preceding the current reporting year Yes. If the consolidated group revenue is ≥ SAR 3,200,000,000 (approx. EUR 750 million) in the reporting year immediately preceding the current reporting year within the 12-month period immediately following the end of the reporting year of its MNE group
Country – by – Country Report No Yes, if the consolidated group revenue is ≥ SAR 3,200,000,000 (approx. EUR 750 million) in the reporting year immediately preceding the current reporting year Yes. If the consolidated group revenue is ≥ SAR 3,200,000,000 (approx. EUR 750 million) in the reporting year immediately preceding the current reporting year Within 120 days from the end of fiscal year i.e. Calendar Year —
Country – by – Country Notification No Yes Yes — —

Local File provides detailed information on Controlled Transaction with the Taxable Person and is, accordingly, supplementary to the Master File. The information required under Local File is consistent with the OECD guidelines

CbCR Notification Form: Every Taxpayer who is a Constituent Entity of an MNE Group must submit to the Authority a CbCR Notification (part of Tax/Zakat Return) no later than 120 days after the last day of the Taxpayer’s Reporting Year. The CbCR Notification must include information on the identity of the Reporting Entity of the MNE Group, its country of tax resident and the country in which the Reporting Entity submits the CbCR

TP Disclosure Form: The Disclosure Form of Controlled Transactions is used by the Authority to conduct a high level Transfer Pricing Risk Assessment. Additional information supporting the Transfer Pricing position taken may be requested by the Authority

Master File provides an overview of the MNE’s global business, the Transfer Pricing Policy and economic activities/ functions of the Related Persons. The information required under Master File is consistent with the OECD guidelines

CA Affidavit: If Sections 1 (the Disclosure Form) and Section 2 (the CbCR Notification Form) are completed accurately, the Taxpayer must attach the Chartered Accountant Certificate declaring that the Transfer Pricing policy of the MNE Group is consistently applied in relation to the Taxpayer in the KSA. With respect to the Chartered Accountant Certificate, GAZT accepts both “limited” and “reasonable” assurance engagements (as endorsed by Standing Committee on Public Accounts) as long as the certificate is provided by a licensed auditor in KSA

Country- by- Country report includes Tax Jurisdiction- wide information on various information relating to the MNE’s global activities: In principle, the Ultimate Parent Entity (UPE) or Surrogate Parent Entity (SPE) should submit the CbCR

General TP Documentation: Applicable to all the taxpayers having controlled transactions where TP Bylaws apply. No specific requirements prescribed and therefore applies a format- free approach. Generally, most information listed in the Bylaws under the Master File and Local File should be documented, including in particular a Functional Analysis and an economic analysis.

The Authority may direct any Person (as listed in the Bylaws) to prepare and maintain documentation related to Controlled Transactions and to request such Person to provide such documentation within the time which shall in all cases be no less than Thirty (30) days from the date of the Authority’s request

Key Features of RHQ

  • Valid License & Permitted Activities: Must have valid license and the activities covered under such license. The main activities of the RHQ are restricted to strengthening the group’s profile in the region, providing strategic supervision, administrative guidance and support for the internal business of the Company, subsidiaries, and other related companies. Optional activities such as sales and marketing. RHQ should earn income from only the above activities and must incur operational expenditure in relation to its activities. Related persons shall have the same meaning as the TP Bylaws of KSA
  • Tax Benefits: Zero percent income tax and zero percent withholding tax for 30 years.
  • Personnel Requirements: Must have at least one resident director in RHQ. Must employ adequate employees with adequate qualification and skill set to conduct such activities
  • Accounting & Reporting : Must prepare and maintain the books of accounts for each full and partial tax years and file the tax returns and Zakat Returns
  • Transfer Pricing Compliance: RHQ must comply with Transfer Pricing Bylaws of KSA and must ensure all the transactions with related persons are conducted at arm’s length
  • Authority Oversight & Ruling Requests: The Authority has powers to carry out the audit, call for any information and monitor the fulfilment of economic substance in respect of RHQ in accordance with the procedures and provisions outlined in the relevant Tax and Zakat laws. RHQ may submit a request for a Ruling to the Tax authorities to provide interpretation and clarifications on tax rules and Bylaws
  • Penalties: Penalties outlined in the Tax and Zakat laws apply to RHQ

Transfer Pricing Considerations

  • Functions, Assets & Risk (FAR) Analysis: Conducting a detailed Functions, Assets and Risk analysis to support the licensed activities of RHQ
  • Transfer Pricing Method Selection: Evaluation of the most appropriate method to commensurate with the key licensed activities of RHQ
  • Intercompany Agreement vs. Conduct Analysis: Thorough analysis of the terms of the intercompany agreements vis-a-vis conduct of the parties to substantiate economic substance
  • Controlled Transaction Evaluation: Evaluate controlled transactions to identify the deviations from the eligible income and expenditures of the RHQ
  • Periodic & Year-End Adjustments: Thorough periodical and year-end adjustments to meet the arm’s length principle requirements
  • Extensive Documentation: Maintain extensive documentation in relation to the above to substantiate the arm’s length nature of the controlled transactions
  • Compliance with Bylaws: Meet the robust documentation requirements as per the Bylaws to avoid penal consequences

The KSA has not implemented the global minimum tax and qualifying domestic minimum tax pursuant to OECD pillar 2

Highlights of APA Program

  • APAs can be requested for related party transactions with a minimum value of SAR 100,000,000. Exemption to certain complex transactions from this threshold can be granted by the governor
  • A comprehensive application must be submitted at least 12 months before the first financial year covered by the APA
  • The duration of the APA is three years
  • Currently, there are no fees associated with the application for the APA
  • Annual Compliance Report is to be submitted annually during the period covered by the APA

Benefits of APA Mechanism

  • Managing TP risks
  • Achieve tax certainty and
  • Minimize the potential for disputes with the tax authority

A tailored approach considering the industry and operations of the taxpayers of the KSA

  • Timely analysis on applicability of the Bylaws including amendments and updates
  • Evaluation of existing transfer pricing policies and intercompany agreement to identify the risks and frame mitigation strategies
  • Periodic monitoring and evaluation of the controlled transactions to advise on the arm’s length requirements
  • End to end assistance in Annual TP Compliance
  • Upfront advise on future transactions including evaluation of APA and Rulings as an option

Specific Support to RHQ

  • Detailed documentation with FAR analysis Analysis of Cost- Plus Vs Profit Split Framing the risk mitigation strategies for RHQ in addition to the annual compliance
  • Evaluation of Pillar 2 implications in case RHQs and Special Economic Zones for inbound MNCs which have IIR implemented

About us

VSTN Consultancy is a Global Transfer Pricing firm with extensive expertise in the field of international taxation and transfer pricing. VSTN Consultancy has been awarded by International Tax Review (ITR) as Best Newcomer in Asia Pacific – 2024 and is ranked as one of the recommended transfer pricing firms. VSTN has also been nominated in 9 Categories under APAC, EMEA and Middle East Region ITR awards 2025. VSTN has its offices in India and Dubai.

Nithya Srinivasan, Founder of VSTN Consultancy, was named Middle East Transfer Pricing Practice Leader of the Year, recognizing her outstanding leadership and contribution to the profession. VSTN also received the Best Newcomer in the Middle East award from International Tax Review, showcasing its rapid growth and excellence in global transfer pricing advisory.

VSTN Consultancy has been honored with the Best Global Transfer Pricing Consultancy 2025 – India award at the prestigious Wealth & Finance Management Consulting Awards 2025.

Our offering spans the end-to-end Transfer Pricing value chain, including design of intercompany policy and drafting of Interco agreement, ensuring effective implementation of the Transfer Pricing policy, year-end documentation and certification, BEPS related compliances (including advisory, Masterfile, Country by Country report), safe harbour filing, audit defense before all forums and dispute prevention mechanisms such as Advance Pricing agreement. VSTNs senior partners have been ranked in ITR in the list of recognized Practitioners.

Locations Served

Australia Philippines
Belgium Singapore
Denmark Switzerland
India Turkey
Italy UAE
KSA UK
Mexico USA
Netherlands Zambia

Core Team

vstn

Nithya Srinivasan

Srilakshmi Hariharan

S Ranjani

E Rajesh

Nitya Joseph

Saranya Nagarajan

Triveni Palla

9:19:52/02:24.4

centest@vetmconsultancy.com

www.vstnconsultancy.com

Our Licensed Databases

SNo Database Provider
1 TP Catalyst Moody’s
2 ORBIS Moody’s
3 Loan Module Moody’s
4 IP & Royalty Data Moody’s
5 Royalty Rates and Benchmark Module ktMINE
6 Services CUT ktMINE
7 EDF-X Bond Database Moody’s
8 EDF-X Credit Risk Analytics Moody’s
9 Loan Module Royalty Range
10 Transfer Pricing Documenter (formerly Thomson Reuters Onesource) Ryan
11 Prowess CMIE

As businesses expand across borders, navigating complex transfer pricing regulations becomes critical. At VSTN Consultancy, a global transfer pricing firm, we specialize in helping companies stay compliant and competitive across key markets including:

India | UAE | Singapore | USA | KSA | Dubai | Asia Pacific | Europe | Africa | North America

Whether you’re preparing for benchmarking intercompany transactions, or developing robust TP documentation, our team is here to support your international strategy and Compliance.

Contact us today to explore how we can partner with you to optimize your global transfer pricing approach.

#TransferPricing #TransferPricingFirm#VSTNConsultancy #TaxCompliance #IndiaUAEUSA

#TPExperts#TransferPricingExperts#GlobalTransferPricingFirm

VSTN – Transfer Pricing Update | Series – 1

VSTN – Transfer Pricing Update | Series – 1: New Form 48 Notified replacing Form No. 3CEB

The draft Income-tax Rules, 2026 has been released by the CBDT, inviting inputs / comments from stakeholders and public by 22 February, 2026.

Considering the revamp of the Income -tax Act and Income-tax Rules in its entirety,  VSTN will be capturing the changes on Transfer pricing related aspects in a “Series”.

The First alert in this series covers Form No. 48, which was erstwhile Form No. 3CEB. This marks an important development in the transfer pricing compliance arena. The revamped form has enhanced disclosure requirements which is aimed at improving transparency and aiding tax authorities in assessing the intra-group transactions of the MNEs. VSTN’s alert elaborates the major changes in Form No. 48.

Key highlights include:

  1. Clear segregation of transactions as received and paid
  2. Mandatory disclosure of details under Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs)
  3. Explicit listing of transaction categories in drop down menus for clarity
  4. Additional disclosures for royalty, corporate guarantees, and inter company financing
  5. Capturing of costs relating to free of cost assets and expenses
  6. Disclosure of the economic adjustments made to the comparables
  7. Emphasis on maintaining updated intercompany agreements and robust documentation
  8. Cautious application of the aggregation concept, with method wise ALP determination

While clarity is being awaiting on the benchmarking considerations for taxpayers with transaction threshold less than INR 1crore and taxpayers proposing to opt for Safe Harbor Rules, documentation remains as the heart of transfer pricing.

More alerts related to the other transfer pricing aspects in the draft Income Tax Rules to follow in next instalment of this series.

Open Attachment…

Draft Income Tax Rules Form 48 (replacing Form 3CEB) February 2026

Background

The draft Income Tax Rules, 2026 have been released by CBDT recently and is open for feedback from stakeholders and public till 22nd February 2026. As part of the new Rules, the draft Form 48 has been released which is set to replace the existing Form No. 3CEB.

The old Form No. 3CEB was a simple certificate from an accountant covering the following information for companies who have entered into transactions with their associated enterprises (‘AE’s’):

  • Name and address associated enterprises
  • Transaction with such associated enterprises
  • Nature of transaction whose disclosure is split across various clauses
  • Actual value of such transaction and the arm’s length price
  • Method in which the transactions are certified to be at arm’s length.

An exhaustive set of key elements relating to transfer pricing documentation is required to be covered under Draft Form No. 48. The key aspects of the Accountant’s Form are captured in the ensuing paragraphs.

Major changes in new Form 48

The major changes in the new Form 48 can be categorized under the following broad heads:

  • A. Changes to the structure of the form wherein the existing information covered under erstwhile Form 3CEB is rearranged in the new Form (Structural changes)
  • B. Introduction of additional items to the new form which was not covered in the erstwhile Form 3CEB which is highly critical and invite the attention of the taxpayer (Qualitative changes);

A. Structural changes

  1. Overall structure of the form has been changed. The new Form 48 is a digital form with Parts A to F.
    • Part A – Particulars of the Assessee
    • Part B – Aggregate value of transactions
    • Part C – International transactions (including. deemed international transactions)
    • Part D – Specified Domestic Transactions
    • Part E – Arm’s Length Price (ALP) determination
    • Part F – Documentation
  2. AE identification ID (in case of international & specified domestic transactions) and Person identification ID (in case of deemed international transactions) are required to be provided in point 5 which is used as reference in all other parts of the form. Similarly, the Transactions ID’s are required to be provided for each transaction which is used for mapping in Part E where ALP determination details are being provided.
  3. Tax Identification Number is made mandatory in cases where PAN is not available, and where Tax identification is unavailable Unique Identification Number will have to provided. Hence, Indian taxpayers will have to obtain and furnish the TIN from the respective Associated enterprises with whom international transactions have been entered into.
  4. The taxpayer has been provided with the option to choose their ‘relationship with AEs’ under multiple categories in Part C of the form.
  5. Transaction disclosure requires selection of transactions from the available drop-down list. These transactions have been categorized by type, with corresponding information provided in the notes.
  6. Code for nature of business that was required in Part A of Form 3CEB has now been deleted.
  7. Clause references are removed completely. Unlike Form 3CEB, no specific clause has been provided for each category of transaction. All the international & deemed international transactions are listed in point 7 and specified domestic transactions are listed in point 9.
  8. The draft Form 48 does not seem to have specific provision for providing any comments/ notes.

B. Qualitative changes

  1. The aggregate value of international, deemed international transactions and specified domestic transactions have been segregated as ‘received’ and ‘paid’ categories and disclosed separately. This section would be auto-populated from relevant sections.
  2. Assessee’s who have entered into Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) are subject to additional disclosure requirements where the details of concluded APAs are required to be provided including the date of agreement, acknowledgement number of the application, details of transactions covered under the APA and the value of such transactions.
  3. Part E is introduced to disclose how ALP has been determined for each of the international/deemed international or SDTs. This section requires disclosure of:
    • Whether the transactions have been tested on a standalone basis or on an aggregated basis;
    • The amount so aggregated, if applicable;
    • If aggregation approach is not adopted, the amount that has not been aggregated;
    • The method adopted to substantiate those transactions not aggregated.
  4. Detailed disclosures are required for the determination of ALP under each of the prescribed methods, as tabulated below:
    Method Details to be provided in Form 48
    CUP – Number of comparables identified
    – In case of 1 comparable – the arm’s length price of that comparable
  5. In case any transaction which are not included or have been partially included in the benchmarking approach and alternate approach has been adopted, then similar details are required to be provided for each of the transaction that is being benchmarked separately.
  6. The ALP determined by adopting each of the above methods and suo-moto adjustment, if any on account of non-fulfilment of the arm’s length criteria, are required to be provided in Part E. The manner of computation of adjustment and its impact on the book value have all been detailed in the notes.
  7. The revised form requires the taxpayers to disclose any economic adjustments applied to the comparable companies.
  8. The form requires disclosure of whether the documentation requirements apply to the assessee, and if so, confirmation that appropriate records substantiating the arms’ length pricing is being maintained.
  9. The disclosure requirements for issue and buy-back of shares and convertible debentures have been removed.
  10. Specific disclosure requirements have been mandated for Royalty / Corporate Guarantee / Intercompany financing – such as providing the date of agreement, royalty/interest/guarantee rates, currency and value.
  11. Additional disclosure requirements for the below including details of whether the same is recorded in the books and considered for computation of ALP:
    • a. Stock compensation
    • b. Cost and depreciation related to assets/software/tools developed in-house or purchased by AEs
    • c. Training expenses/other cost incurred by the AE on behalf of the assessee
    • d. Costs incurred by AE that is utilised in the business operations of the assessee
    • e. Income arising from forex fluctuations
    • f. Income from subsidy/grant/duty drawback or concession by Central/State government.
  12. The disclosure relating to business restructuring or reorganisation, regardless of whether it impacts the enterprise’s profits, assets, or income/loss has been retained similar to existing Form 3CEB.

The maintenance of transfer pricing documentation is a key requirement, and such documentation must be prepared before Form 48 is filed and there is no waiting for scrutiny before preparing the documentation. MNEs are therefore obligated to comply from day one of the financial year. Considering the requirement to disclose the benchmarking results for each transaction, one may need to undertake necessary benchmarking analysis to substantiate the information disclosed in the form.

The transactions requiring disclosure are explicitly listed in the drop- down menu – for example, the intangibles to be considered as purchase of intangibles, types of financing agreements to be disclosed, nature of intra- group services requiring disclosure, thereby providing more clarity on the disclosure requirements. Previously, taxpayers, out of abundant caution would report the issue of shares as an international transaction as the Clause in Form 3CEB was not eliminated though the Supreme Court ruling in Vodafone India Services Private Limited had excluded share issue from the TP provisions. However, since the revised form no longer includes this aspect, it appears that the CBDT has considered the position of the Supreme Court on the reporting as well. The disclosure requirements in Form 48 are designed to assist tax authorities in compiling relevant information and tracking the assessee’s intra- group transactions and related tax implications. Such information may also be utilized by other regulators through exchange of information. Owing to the same, the interplay between transfer pricing and other regulations such as customs, FEMA regulations should also be carefully considered by the MNEs while structuring their intra- group transactions and also maintain appropriate documentation and ensure alignment on conduct vs. contract. The taxpayers are required to explicitly disclose the margins earned by the tested party vis- a- vis the comparables, which are expected to further aid ‘risk- based assessment’ approach based on which the TP audits are selected for scrutiny. In computing margins under the TNMM, the form considers only the net profit margin. This raises uncertainty as to whether alternative profit level indicators—such as cash profit margins—would be deemed acceptable. While providing the flexibility to undertake economic adjustments on the comparables is a welcome move, the form does not provide any option for undertaking adjustments on the tested party – an approach that has, until now, been widely accepted by the judiciary. For specified domestic transactions, a detailed list on the type of transactions falling under the transfer pricing purview have been explicitly provided, offering greater clarity on these aspects. The enhanced disclosure requirements relating to royalty, guarantee and financing transactions highlight the importance of maintaining proper inter- company contracts/documents while also underscoring the need to keep such agreements regularly updated.

  • Where Taxpayers are opting for Safe Harbour, clarity is awaited on whether a separate section will be included similar to that of APA, since the taxpayers would otherwise have to undertake a detailed benchmarking analysis for justifying the ALP that is already prescribed / agreed in the Safe Harbour Rules.

In certain instances, due to the facts and circumstances, the taxpayer might adopt foreign entity as the tested party. Currently the Form does not have any provision to input such information. Further, as per Note 13 “Computation for the determination of arm’s length price” the information is required to be disclosed in INR. Hence, clarity is awaited on the same.

MNE’s might need to wait for the final rules to understand if the benchmarking requirements are made mandatory in line with the global best practices, even in case the value of international transactions have not exceeded INR 1 crore.


About us

VSTN Consultancy is a Global Transfer Pricing firm with extensive expertise in the field of international taxation and transfer pricing. VSTN Consultancy has been awarded by International Tax Review (ITR) as Best Newcomer in Asia Pacific – 2024 and is ranked as one of the recommended transfer pricing firms. VSTN has also been nominated in 9 Categories under APAC, EMEA and Middle East Region ITR awards 2025. VSTN has its offices in India and Dubai.

Nithya Srinivasan, Founder of VSTN Consultancy, was named Middle East Transfer Pricing Practice Leader of the Year, recognizing her outstanding leadership and contribution to the profession. VSTN also received the Best Newcomer in the Middle East award from International Tax Review, showcasing its rapid growth and excellence in global transfer pricing advisory.

VSTN Consultancy has been honored with the Best Global Transfer Pricing Consultancy 2025 – India award at the prestigious Wealth & Finance Management Consulting Awards 2025.

Our offering spans the end-to-end Transfer Pricing value chain, including design of intercompany policy and drafting of Interco agreement, ensuring effective implementation of the Transfer Pricing policy, year-end documentation and certification, BEPS related compliances (including advisory, Masterfile, Country by Country report), safe harbour filing, audit defense before all forums and dispute prevention mechanisms such as Advance Pricing agreement. VSTNs senior partners have been ranked in ITR in the list of recognized Practitioners.

Locations Served

Australia Philippines
Belgium Singapore
Denmark Switzerland
India Turkey
Italy UAE
KSA UK
Mexico USA
Netherlands Zambia

Core Team

vstn

Nithya Srinivasan

Srilakshmi Hariharan

S Ranjani

E Rajesh

Nitya Joseph

Saranya Nagarajan

Triveni Palla

9:19:52/02:24.4

centest@vetmconsultancy.com

www.vstnconsultancy.com

Our Licensed Databases

SNo Database Provider
1 TP Catalyst Moody’s
2 ORBIS Moody’s
3 Loan Module Moody’s
4 IP & Royalty Data Moody’s
5 Royalty Rates and Benchmark Module ktMINE
6 Services CUT ktMINE
7 EDF-X Bond Database Moody’s
8 EDF-X Credit Risk Analytics Moody’s
9 Loan Module Royalty Range
10 Transfer Pricing Documenter (formerly Thomson Reuters Onesource) Ryan
11 Prowess CMIE

As businesses expand across borders, navigating complex transfer pricing regulations becomes critical. At VSTN Consultancy, a global transfer pricing firm, we specialize in helping companies stay compliant and competitive across key markets including:

India | UAE | Singapore | USA | KSA | Dubai | Asia Pacific | Europe | Africa | North America

Whether you’re preparing for benchmarking intercompany transactions, or developing robust TP documentation, our team is here to support your international strategy and Compliance.

Contact us today to explore how we can partner with you to optimize your global transfer pricing approach.

#TransferPricing #TransferPricingFirm#VSTNConsultancy #TaxCompliance #IndiaUAEUSA

#TPExperts#TransferPricingExperts#GlobalTransferPricingFirm

Union Budget 2026-27

Union Budget 2026-27

The Union Budget 2026, was presented today on 01 February, 2026 . It reflects India’s bold vision of Yuva Shakthi—driving resilience, inclusivity, and global competitiveness. Key reforms target simplification, transparency, and alignment with global best practices.

The New Bill 2026 marks a significant stride in easing the compliance burden, streamlining assessment procedures and is poised to usher a simplified and more transparent transfer pricing regime.

The key changes with respect to transfer pricing include-

  1. Simplifications and rationalisation of safe harbour rules to strengthen the IT Sector-
    • Unified Category: All IT/ITeS, KPO, and IT Contract R&D services are consolidated under a single category — Information Technology Services.
    • Standard mark-up: A common safe harbour markup of 15.5% applies across this unified category.
    • Expanded Threshold: Eligibility limit for availing safe harbour has been significantly raised from INR 300 crore to INR 2000 crore, widening access for larger enterprises.
    • Automated Approval: Applications for safe harbour in IT services will now be processed through a rule-driven automated system, eliminating the need for tax officer intervention or manual acceptance
  2. APA Reforms
    • Fast- tracking of Advance Pricing Agreement process for IT companies to 2 years with extension of 6 months at the option of the Taxpayer
    • Extend the facility of modified returns available to the entity entering APA and to its associated entities also
  3. Rationalising #penalty and prosecution
    • Fast-track settlement of disputes by integrating assessment & penalty proceedings by way of a common order after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the taxpayer
    • Immunity from penalty from underreporting in consequence of misreporting of income and prosecution on payment of 100% of tax amount as additional income-tax.
  4. Clarifications on time limits in case of assessments
    Retrospective Amendments in respect of the below

    • Finance Bill, 2026 has proposed to end any ambiguity on multiple interpretations with regard to the timeline for completion of assessment by clarifying that the Time limit for assessment will be extended by the time limit available for completing the Dispute Resolution Panel (“DRP”) route (if taxpayers opt)
    • In connection with the Computation of sixty days for passing the order by the Transfer Pricing Officer, it has been clarified that the date of limitation is to be included while computing the 60 days.

The above changes marks a strategic step towards streamlining the Transfer Pricing Regulations with an intent to promote a progressive and healthy tax environment to sustain economic growth and advancement.

VSTN’s detailed Analysis is presented in the attached alert.

Open Attachment…

Union Budget 2026-27

Transfer Pricing Perspective

February 2026

Background

The Finance Minister presented the Union Budget for 2026- 27 today on 01 February 2026. Driven by the spirit of Yuva Shakthi the Budget is inspired by 3 kartavyas namely- accelerating and sustaining growth, fulfilling aspirations and building the capacity of people as a pathway to prosperity, and ensuring equal opportunity—the Budget reflects a bold vision for a resilient and inclusive India.

The budget speech featured significant transfer pricing reforms designed to ease the compliance burden on taxpayers while fostering economic stability through greater tax certainty. These measures signal a decisive step toward a more predictable, transparent, and growth- friendly fiscal environment, reinforcing India’s commitment to sustainable development and global competitiveness.

The alert highlights the key changes in the Finance Bill, 2026, pertaining to Transfer Pricing provisions.

Transfer Pricing Updates

Key updates to the Safe Harbour regime

Significant updates to the safe harbour regime have been proposed with the objective of enhancing tax certainty and simplifying compliance for multinational enterprises. These changes are particularly relevant to the most prevalent and frequently litigated category of transactions – IT services, where Indian GCCs remain leading exporters.

While the Budget speech outlines key safe harbour measures, no corresponding amendments have been reflected in the Finance Bill or the accompanying memorandum. It is anticipated that the detailed notification will be issued shortly, for inclusion in the Income Tax Rules.

1. Information technology services

Particulars Earlier provision Budget update
Safe harbour category 4 Different buckets for Software development services, ITES services, KPO services and Contract R&D Services relating to software development As these services are interconnected, they will be clubbed under a single category – Information technology services.
Safe Harbour Mark-ups Ranging from 17-24% Reduced to a common rate of 15.50%
Revenue threshold Upto INR 300 crore Upto INR 2000 crores
Period To be opted every year Once applied, the same Safe Harbour can be continued for a 5-year period, at the company’s discretion
Approval of application Verification of application by tax authorities to confirm whether valid on a year-on-year basis Approved by an automated rule-driven process without any need for tax officer to examine and accept the application

The threshold has been significantly increased, enabling a larger number of taxpayers to opt for the regime and achieve greater tax certainty. In addition, the safe harbour rate has been reduced for the first time in many years, enhancing the overall attractiveness of the scheme. The consolidation of SwD, ITES, KPO, and Contract R&D into a single category of IT services’ is another positive development, as it eliminates any confusion in classifying similar service offerings across multiple buckets which was also a matter of dispute in various cases(e.g BPO/KPO) Automating the approval of safe harbour applications will also reduce approval timelines and eliminate the risk of bias during tax authority examinations. Overall, these changes will be particularly beneficial to captive centres operating in India, many of which have faced persistent tax disputes despite maintaining margins in the range of 15 – 16% on cost.

ii. Foreign Cloud Service Providers

To strengthen India’s critical infrastructure and attract global investment in data centres, a tax holiday until 2047 has been proposed in the Budget. This benefit will apply to foreign companies offering cloud services globally, provided they utilize data centre services provided from India. However, such companies must deliver services to Indian customers via an Indian reseller entity.

In cases where the data centre service provider in India is a related party, a specific safe harbour margin of 15% on cost is proposed, which has a slightly better expected mark- ups as compared to the new rates of 15.50% for IT services.

1. Safe harbour to non-residents for component warehousing in bonded warehouses

To enhance just- in- time logistics in electronic manufacturing, a safe harbour framework has been introduced for non- residents for component warehousing in bonded warehouses. Safe harbour for warehousing components will be available at a profit margin of 2% of invoice value, resulting in an effective tax of approximately 0.7% – lower than rates in competing jurisdictions. This provision could help avoid disputes in connection with profit attribution relating to warehousing activities.

iv. Accountant definition

To support the government’s vision of home- grown accounting and advisory firms to become global leaders, the definition of Accountant for the purposes of Safe Harbour Rules will also be rationalised. Currently the definition of Accountant is relied in the Rules only in connection with the management services safe harbor for certification of the cost pool. Under this it provides a preference to Global firms for the certification as it requires the firm certifying the same to be present in more than 2 countries. However, more information on this is awaited in this regard.

Advance Pricing Agreement (APA)

i. Extension of modified return facility for Associated Enterprises

Budget 2026 rationalises the APA framework by amending section 169 of the Income- tax Act, 2025, corresponding to section 92CD of the Income- tax Act, 1961, to extend the modified return facility beyond the APA applicant to the impacted Associated Enterprise (AE).

While the earlier provision allowed only the APA signatory to file a modified return, the amended section now enables both parties to file a return or modified return, within three months of entering into the APA and limited strictly to the agreement.

This change fills a critical procedural gap by allowing AEs to give effect to corresponding income adjustments and claim refunds of excess tax or TDS, which was not possible earlier. The impact is expected to be particularly significant in cases involving royalty and fees for technical services (FTS), where AEs often suffer withholding tax upfront and were unable to seek refunds despite downward adjustments under APAs for the Indian entity.

Overall, the amendment ensures tax symmetry, improved cash- flow efficiency, and smoother implementation of APA outcomes for multinational groups.

ii. Fast-tracking of Unilateral APAs for IT services

For companies engaged in Information technology service, a fast- track Unilateral APA process is proposed, with an objective to conclude such APAs within two years, extendable by six months on the taxpayer’s request. The timeline of 2 years resonates with the median time period of APA conclusions as indicated in OECD peer review and thereby it is visibly seen that Indian APA program is marching towards aligning with Global best practices starting off with the IT Industry.

In spite of being a successful programme for achieving tax certainty, significant delay in concluding the APA cases pose major challenges to the taxpayer in the form of facing continued TP adjustments till

conclusion, handling litigation simultaneously during the APA tenure, etc., While detail implementation guidance is awaited, this a welcome move towards prevention of probable backlogs of APA cases.

Clarifications on time limits in case of assessments

Considering the judgments of the various courts on interpreting the timelines of assessments, the Finance Bill, 2026 has proposed following amendments to end any scope for multiple interpretations:

Particulars Existing provisions Reason for amendment Amendment Effect
Computation of sixty days for passing the order by the Transfer Pricing Officer As per section 92CA(3A), the TPO may pass the order at any time 60 days prior to the expiry of the limitation period prescribed under section 153 or section 153B for completion of assessment or reassessment. Courts excluded the date of limitation while computing the 60 days resulting in annulment of multiple assessments¹ It has been clarified that the date of limitation is to be included while computing the 60 days. This clarification shall come into force with retrospective effect from June 1st, 2007 in case of old Act and corresponding amendment is made in New Act which is effective from 1 April 2026. Old Act: Due dates for issuance of TP Order are 30 Jan (non-leap year)/ 31 January (leap year)/ 1 November (where limitation of assessment expires on 31 December) New Act: Due date for issuance of TP order is one month prior to the month in which the period of limitation expires, i.e., 31 January/ 31 October.
Clarification on time-limit for completion of assessment under section 144C Section 153 provides a time limit for completion of assessment, reassessment, and recomputation. Section 153B provides time limit for completion of assessment in search cases. Notwithstanding anything contained in section 153 or section In various judgements, courts have taken a view that the entire process of section 144C has to satisfy the overall time limit notwithstanding the time limit provided in section 153 and section 153B, it is proposed to clarify in section 153 and section 153B that timelines in these sections govern the draft order stage and the timelines provided in section 144C operate for finalization of assessments. The time available for completing the assessment by the Assessing Officer post ITATV CIT(A)/ is extended by the time limit available for completing the proceedings under the Dispute Resolution Panel (“DRP”) route (if taxpayers opt).

2 Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Ltd. Appeal arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 20569-72/2023 and SLP(C) No. 25798/2024 and Writ Petition No.2340 Of 2021 Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P.) Ltd. [2022] 445 537 (Madras)

1. Failure to furnish TP Accountant’s Report (Form No. 3CEB)

Section 447 provided for a penalty of ¥ 1,000,000 for failure to furnish report under section 172 of the Act (i.e. Form 3CEB) within the due date. In the Union budget certain penalties have been reclassified and officially termed as fees’. In line with the same, the existing penalty has been removed, and new section 428 (4) has been introduced wherein it is proposed to charge a graded fee of ¥ 50,000 and ¥ 1,000,000 depending on the period of delay.

ii. Imposition of Interest for under-reporting or misreporting of income within Assessment Order

Under the existing provisions i.e. Sec 274 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, penalty procedures are required to be initiated separately, and penalty cannot be levied without providing the assessee an opportunity of being heard for. With an intention to promote consistency and integrate the assessment- penalty framework, it is now proposed that a single combined order for both assessment and penalty for underreporting and mis- reporting of income can be issued which has been provided for in Section 439(11) of the Income Tax Act, 2025. At this juncture it raises a critical concern amongst the taxpayers as to whether the levy of penalty proceedings, which was under the discretion of the Assessing officer earlier, is being made automatic vide this amendment.

Further, it is proposed that interest on pending/ additional demand (u/s 220 of 1961 Act) can be charged only after the order is passed by CIT(A) or ITAT (for appeal against DRP orders). This amendment is applicable from 1st March of 2026 on any draft assessment order or reassessment made after 1st April 2027.

iii. Expansion of Immunity from penalty in case of under-reporting or mis-reporting of income

Section 440 of the Income- tax Act, 2025 expands immunity from penalty (Section 439) and prosecution ( Section 478 and 479) to misreporting cases, subject to payment of additional tax, thereby promoting early dispute resolution and reducing litigation.

Earlier, immunity under section 440 was available only in cases of under- reporting of income, and not in cases where under- reporting arose due to misreporting. It is now proposed to extend immunity to cases of misreporting, provided the assessee pays additional tax equal to 100% of tax payable on such misreported income, in lieu of penalty. This amendment will take effect from the 1st day of March, 2026 for Assessment Year 2026- 27 (Previous Year 2025- 26) or any earlier Assessment years.

The provision of immunity is subject to the following conditions:

  • Tax and interest as per the assessment order are paid within the prescribed time, and No appeal is filed against the assessment order.
  • The assessee must apply for immunity within one month from the end of the month in which the assessment order is received, and the Assessing Officer must pass an order within three months from receipt of the application.

1. Rationalization of prosecution proceedings

Rigorous imprisonment of up to 7 years for tax- related offences has been decriminalized. Maximum imprisonment reduced from 7 years to 2 years (first offence) & 3 years (subsequent offences). Graded punishments have been prescribed based on the amount of tax involved. Imposition of fines alone where tax evasion does not exceed 10 lakh. Fine introduced in lieu of or in addition to imprisonment.

v. Payment of demand for seeking stay

Pre- deposit requirement is reduced from 20% to 10% , to be computed only on the core tax demand, detailed implementation guidance is awaited

Our Thoughts

The New Bill marks a significant stride in easing the compliance burden, streamlining assessment procedures, and aligning India’s transfer pricing framework with global best practices. These amendments are poised to usher a simplified and more transparent transfer pricing environment. Further, certain notable amendments targetting specific industry / business, such as changes to Safe harbor rules and APA program benefitting the IT companies, lead the country into a positive growth trajectory. India being a hub for GCC, these amendments directed towards IT companies will evidently present a vibrant climate for GCCs.

The Government’s intent to ease compliance is reflected in the Hble Finance Minister’s budget speech highlighting that the simplified Income Tax Rules and Forms will be notified shortly that can be easily comprehended by ordinary citizens as well without difficulty. Further it is expected that the Simplified rules to be notified will remove the anomalies and amquities surrounding the new Income Tax Act, 2025 for instance with respect to clarity on definition of “Control” and “Management” with respect to Associated Enterprises .

That said, expectations around the introduction of Pillar Two regulations remained high. India appears to be adopting a cautious “wait- and- watch” approach, yet Indian- headquartered multinationals cannot afford complacency. With filing requirements under Pillar Two commencing in several jurisdictions this year, proactive preparedness is essential. Organizations must anticipate cross- border obligations, strengthen internal processes, and ensure readiness to meet evolving global compliance standards.


About us

VSTN Consultancy is a Global Transfer Pricing firm with extensive expertise in the field of international taxation and transfer pricing. VSTN Consultancy has been awarded by International Tax Review (ITR) as Best Newcomer in Asia Pacific – 2024 and is ranked as one of the recommended transfer pricing firms. VSTN has also been nominated in 9 Categories under APAC, EMEA and Middle East Region ITR awards 2025. VSTN has its offices in India and Dubai.

Nithya Srinivasan, Founder of VSTN Consultancy, was named Middle East Transfer Pricing Practice Leader of the Year, recognizing her outstanding leadership and contribution to the profession. VSTN also received the Best Newcomer in the Middle East award from International Tax Review, showcasing its rapid growth and excellence in global transfer pricing advisory.

VSTN Consultancy has been honored with the Best Global Transfer Pricing Consultancy 2025 – India award at the prestigious Wealth & Finance Management Consulting Awards 2025.

Our offering spans the end-to-end Transfer Pricing value chain, including design of intercompany policy and drafting of Interco agreement, ensuring effective implementation of the Transfer Pricing policy, year-end documentation and certification, BEPS related compliances (including advisory, Masterfile, Country by Country report), safe harbour filing, audit defense before all forums and dispute prevention mechanisms such as Advance Pricing agreement. VSTNs senior partners have been ranked in ITR in the list of recognized Practitioners.

Locations Served

Australia Philippines
Belgium Singapore
Denmark Switzerland
India Turkey
Italy UAE
KSA UK
Mexico USA
Netherlands Zambia

Core Team

vstn

Nithya Srinivasan

Srilakshmi Hariharan

S Ranjani

E Rajesh

Nitya Joseph

Saranya Nagarajan

Triveni Palla

9:19:52/02:24.4

centest@vetmconsultancy.com

www.vstnconsultancy.com

Our Licensed Databases

SNo Database Provider
1 TP Catalyst Moody’s
2 ORBIS Moody’s
3 Loan Module Moody’s
4 IP & Royalty Data Moody’s
5 Royalty Rates and Benchmark Module ktMINE
6 Services CUT ktMINE
7 EDF-X Bond Database Moody’s
8 EDF-X Credit Risk Analytics Moody’s
9 Loan Module Royalty Range
10 Transfer Pricing Documenter (formerly Thomson Reuters Onesource) Ryan
11 Prowess CMIE

As businesses expand across borders, navigating complex transfer pricing regulations becomes critical. At VSTN Consultancy, a global transfer pricing firm, we specialize in helping companies stay compliant and competitive across key markets including:

India | UAE | Singapore | USA | KSA | Dubai | Asia Pacific | Europe | Africa | North America

Whether you’re preparing for benchmarking intercompany transactions, or developing robust TP documentation, our team is here to support your international strategy and Compliance.

Contact us today to explore how we can partner with you to optimize your global transfer pricing approach.

#TransferPricing #TransferPricingFirm#VSTNConsultancy #TaxCompliance #IndiaUAEUSA

#TPExperts#TransferPricingExperts#GlobalTransferPricingFirm

Recent Posts
  • VSTN Transfer Pricing Update | Series – 3
  • VSTN Transfer Pricing Update | Series – 2
  • KSA- Transfer Pricing Landscape
  • VSTN – Transfer Pricing Update | Series – 1
  • Union Budget 2026-27
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • August 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    Categories
    • Transfer Pricing
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Consult Visionary Solutions Transferpricing Network (VSTN) for your needs.

    Contact Us
    Global Transfer Pricing Firm

    (IND) +91 99620 12244
    (UAE) +971 58 305 3317
    (KSA) +966 55 667 8071
    contact@vstnconsultancy.com

    VSTN Consultancy © 2026. All Rights Reserved. Powered by VSTN Technologies.